Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24972323›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2014

Spindle orientation: what if it goes wrong?

Dan T Bergstralh, Daniel St Johnston

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contribution of cytoplasm viscoelastic properties to mitotic spindle positioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Centrosome instability: when good centrosomes go bad.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cell Fate Decision Making through Oriented Cell Division.Journal of developmental biology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dan T BergstralhThe Gurdon Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom; The Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: db476@cam.ac.uk.
Daniel St JohnstonThe Gurdon Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom; The Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: d.stjohnston@gurdon.cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 080007Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The angle of cell division is critical in at least two contexts. It can determine cell fate, as it does in developing neural tissue. It can also dictate tissue architecture, as it does in many epithelia. One way to ensure the correct angle of cell division is through controlled orientation of the spindle at metaphase. What happens when that control is lost? Ongoing work suggests that the consequence of metaphase spindle misorientation may be significant, but multiple mechanisms exist to protect the cell and the tissue. We speculate that one such mechanism involves a recently identified anaphase activity for two of the key players at metaphase: NuMA (Mud, LIN-5) and dynein.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NuclearCarcinogenesisCell Cycle ProteinsCentral Nervous SystemHumansMitosisNeoplasmsNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsSpindle ApparatusAntigens, NuclearCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsNUMA1 protein, humanEpitheliaMetaphaseNeuroblastNuMa/Mud/LIN-5Spindle orientationTumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID24972323
PMCPMC4169663
OpenAlexW2087783233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.