Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24972089›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental biology2014

Symmetry breakage in the vertebrate embryo: when does it happen and how does it work?

Martin Blum, Axel Schweickert, Philipp Vick, Christopher V E Wright, Michael V Danilchik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-classical functions of nuclear pore proteins in ciliopathy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Special Issue: Left-Right Asymmetry and Cardiac Morphogenesis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martin BlumUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Zoology (220), Garbenstrasse 30, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: martin.blum@uni-hohenheim.de.
Axel SchweickertUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Zoology (220), Garbenstrasse 30, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Philipp VickUniversity of Hohenheim, Institute of Zoology (220), Garbenstrasse 30, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Christopher V E WrightDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-0494, USA.
Michael V DanilchikDepartment of Integrative Biosciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.

Funding

BIOLOGICAL ROLES OF NODAL RELATED GENES IN EMBRYOGENESISR01GM056238 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER V · 1997 to 2010
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056238NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM56238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetric development of the vertebrate embryo has fascinated embryologists for over a century. Much has been learned since the asymmetric Nodal signaling cascade in the left lateral plate mesoderm was detected, and began to be unraveled over the past decade or two. When and how symmetry is initially broken, however, has remained a matter of debate. Two essentially mutually exclusive models prevail. Cilia-driven leftward flow of extracellular fluids occurs in mammalian, fish and amphibian embryos. A great deal of experimental evidence indicates that this flow is indeed required for symmetry breaking. An alternative model has argued, however, that flow simply acts as an amplification step for early asymmetric cues generated by ion flux during the first cleavage divisions. In this review we critically evaluate the experimental basis of both models. Although a number of open questions persist, the available evidence is best compatible with flow-based symmetry breakage as the archetypical mode of symmetry breakage.

Indexed as

Body PatterningAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianFishesGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalH(+)-K(+)-Exchanging ATPaseLeft-Right Determination FactorsMammalsMesodermNodal ProteinOrganizers, EmbryonicSerotoninSignal TransductionVertebratesXenopusH(+)-K(+)-Exchanging ATPaseLeft-Right Determination FactorsNodal ProteinSerotoninCiliaIon-flux modelLeft–right asymmetryLeftward flowSymmetry breakage

Identifiers

PMID24972089
PMCPMC4481729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.