Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24971829›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Epimorphin alters the inhibitory effects of SOX9 on Mmp13 in activated hepatic stellate cells.

James Pritchett, Varinder S Athwal, Emma Harvey, Katherine Martin, Jessica Llewellyn, Philip Ireland, Alexander Nicolaides, Martin J Humphries, Nicoletta Bobola, Neil A Hanley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James PritchettCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Varinder S AthwalCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Emma HarveyCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Katherine MartinCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Jessica LlewellynCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Philip IrelandCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alexander NicolaidesCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Martin J HumphriesWellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Nicoletta BobolaSchool of Dentistry, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Neil A HanleyCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karen Piper HanleyCentre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/J003352/1Medical Research Council MR/K003194/1Wellcome Trust 088566Wellcome Trust WT088566MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLiver fibrosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is characterised by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition from activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Although potentially reversible, treatment remains limited. Understanding how ECM influences the pathogenesis of the disease may provide insight into novel therapeutic targets for the disease. The extracellular protein Epimorphin (EPIM) has been implicated in tissue repair mechanisms in several tissues, partially, through its ability to manipulate proteases. In this study, we have identified that EPIM modulates the ECM environment produced by activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), in part, through down-regulation of pro-fibrotic Sex-determining region Y-box 9 (SOX9).

methodsInfluence of EPIM on ECM was investigated in cultured primary rat HSCs. Activated HSCs were treated with recombinant EPIM or SOX9 siRNA. Core fibrotic factors were evaluated by immunoblotting, qPCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP).

resultsDuring HSC activation EPIM became significantly decreased in contrast to pro-fibrotic markers SOX9, Collagen type 1 (COL1), and α-Smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). Treatment of activated HSCs with recombinant EPIM caused a reduction in α-SMA, SOX9, COL1 and Osteopontin (OPN), while increasing expression of the collagenase matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13). Sox9 abrogation in activated HSCs increased EPIM and MMP13 expression.

conclusionThese data provide evidence for EPIM and SOX9 functioning by mutual negative feedback to regulate attributes of the quiescent or activated state of HSCs. Further understanding of EPIM's role may lead to opportunities to modulate SOX9 as a therapeutic avenue for liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCollagenDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionGene Expression RegulationGene Knockdown TechniquesHepatic Stellate CellsLiver CirrhosisMatrix Metalloproteinase 13Membrane GlycoproteinsNucleotide MotifsPeptide HydrolasesProtein BindingProteolysisCollagenMatrix Metalloproteinase 13Membrane GlycoproteinsPeptide HydrolasesSOX9 Transcription FactorStx2 protein, rat

Identifiers

PMID24971829
PMCPMC4074045
OpenAlexW2137889544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.