Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24971745›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Population distribution analyses reveal a hierarchy of molecular players underlying parallel endocytic pathways.

Gagan D Gupta, Gautam Dey, M G Swetha, Balaji Ramalingam, Khader Shameer, Joseph Jose Thottacherry, Joseph Mathew Kalappurakkal, Mark T Howes, Ruma Chandran, Anupam Das and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Spoiled for Choice: Diverse Endocytic Pathways Function at the Cell Surface.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Building endocytic pits without clathrin.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gagan D GuptaNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Gautam DeyNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
M G SwethaNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Balaji RamalingamNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Khader ShameerNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Joseph Jose ThottacherryNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Joseph Mathew KalappurakkalNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Mark T HowesThe University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Queensland, Australia.
Ruma ChandranNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Anupam DasNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Sindhu MenonNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Robert G PartonThe University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Queensland, Australia.
R SowdhaminiNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Mukund ThattaiNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
Satyajit MayorNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, UAS/GKVK Campus, Bangalore, India.
National Centre for Biological Sciences · INTata Institute of Fundamental Research · INUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell-resolved measurements reveal heterogeneous distributions of clathrin-dependent (CD) and -independent (CLIC/GEEC: CG) endocytic activity in Drosophila cell populations. dsRNA-mediated knockdown of core versus peripheral endocytic machinery induces strong changes in the mean, or subtle changes in the shapes of these distributions, respectively. By quantifying these subtle shape changes for 27 single-cell features which report on endocytic activity and cell morphology, we organize 1072 Drosophila genes into a tree-like hierarchy. We find that tree nodes contain gene sets enriched in functional classes and protein complexes, providing a portrait of core and peripheral control of CD and CG endocytosis. For 470 genes we obtain additional features from separate assays and classify them into early- or late-acting genes of the endocytic pathways. Detailed analyses of specific genes at intermediate levels of the tree suggest that Vacuolar ATPase and lysosomal genes involved in vacuolar biogenesis play an evolutionarily conserved role in CG endocytosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCHO CellsClathrinCricetinaeCricetulusDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEndocytosisEye ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingHemocytesHumansQa-SNARE ProteinsRNA Interferencecar protein, DrosophilaClathrinDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsQa-SNARE ProteinsRNA, Small Interferingsyntaxin, DrosophilaVacuolar Proton-Translocating ATPases

Identifiers

PMID24971745
PMCPMC4074053
OpenAlexW2039441355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.