Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24971628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Direct amplification, sequencing and profiling of Chlamydia trachomatis strains in single and mixed infection clinical samples.

Sandeep J Joseph, Ben Li, Tanvi Ghonasgi, Chad P Haase, Zhaohui S Qin, Deborah Dean, Timothy D Read

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and Genetic Characterization ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chlamydiae - What's New?Journal of veterinary research · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bacterial genome sequencing in clinical microbiology: a pathogen-oriented review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandeep J JosephDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ben LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Tanvi GhonasgiCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Chad P HaaseDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Zhaohui S QinDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Deborah DeanCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Joint Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Timothy D ReadDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America; Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Multiplex diagnostic for biothreat C. psittaci & non-threat respiratory pathogensR01AI098843 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RES CTR AT OAKLAND · PI DEAN, DEBORAH ANNE, READ, TIMOTHY D. · 2012 to 2016
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098843NIAID NIH HHS R01AI098843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing bacterial genomes from DNA isolated directly from clinical samples offers the promise of rapid and precise acquisition of informative genetic information. In the case of Chlamydia trachomatis, direct sequencing is particularly desirable because it obviates the requirement for culture in mammalian cells, saving time, cost and the possibility of missing low abundance strains. In this proof of concept study, we developed methodology that would allow genome-scale direct sequencing, using a multiplexed microdroplet PCR enrichment technology to amplify a 100 kb region of the C. trachomatis genome with 500 1.1-1.3 kb overlapping amplicons (5-fold amplicon redundancy). We integrated comparative genomic data into a pipeline to preferentially select conserved sites for amplicon design. The 100 kb target region could be amplified from clinical samples, including remnants from diagnostics tests, originating from the cervix, urethra and urine, For rapid analysis of these data, we developed a framework for whole-genome based genotyping called binstrain. We used binstrain to estimate the proportion of SNPs originating from 14 C. trachomatis reference serotype genomes in each sample. Direct DNA sequencing methods such as the one described here may have an important role in understanding the biology of C. trachomatis mixed infections and the natural genetic variation of the species within clinically relevant ecological niches.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID24971628
PMCPMC4074039
OpenAlexW2094544480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.