Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24971478›Full record

ReviewJournal of palliative medicine2014

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pre-irradiation evaluation and management of brain metastases.

Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Brain Metastases, Simon Shek-Man Lo, Elizabeth M Gore, Jeffrey D Bradley, John M Buatti, Isabelle Germano, A Paiman Ghafoori, Mark A Henderson, Gregory J A Murad, Roy A Patchell and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of palliative medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Relevance of Steroid Use in Neuro-Oncology.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology-Brain Metastases
Simon Shek-Man Lo1 UH Seidman Cancer Center , Cleveland, Ohio.
Elizabeth M Gore
Jeffrey D Bradley
John M Buatti
Isabelle Germano
A Paiman Ghafoori
Mark A Henderson
Gregory J A Murad
Roy A Patchell
Samir H Patel
Jared R Robbins
H Ian Robins
Andrew D Vassil
Franz J Wippold
Michael J Yunes
Gregory M M Videtic

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pretreatment evaluation is performed to determine the number, location, and size of the brain metastases and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the recommended imaging technique, particularly in patients being considered for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery. A contiguous thin-cut volumetric MRI with gadolinium with newer gadolinium-based agents can improve detection of small brain metastases. A systemic workup and medical evaluation are important, given that subsequent treatment for the brain metastases will also depend on the extent of the extracranial disease and on the age and performance status of the patient. Patients with hydrocephalus or impending brain herniation should be started on high doses of corticosteroids and evaluated for possible neurosurgical intervention. Patients with moderate symptoms should receive approximately 4-8 mg/d of dexamethasone in divided doses. The routine use of corticosteroids in patients without neurologic symptoms is not necessary. There is no proven benefit of anticonvulsants in patient without seizures. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationPractice Guidelines as TopicBrain NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeurologic Examination

Identifiers

PMID24971478
PMCPMC4275774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.