ReviewJournal of palliative medicine2014
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® pre-irradiation evaluation and management of brain metastases.
Review in Journal of palliative medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Practical Review of Role and Usage of Corticosteroids in Modern Neuro-Oncology Care.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Review
- Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Women in neurosurgical oncology: Mapping the milestones and shaping the future.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Multi-plane vision transformer for hemorrhage classification using axial and sagittal MRI data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic interplay between corticosteroid treatment and the role of SRC-1 gene dysregulation in the progression of WHO-Grade 4 Astrocytoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- Imaging of Oligometastatic Disease.Cancers · 2022Review
- Article
- Optimal Management of Corticosteroids in Patients with Intracranial Malignancies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Article
- MRI-based radiosurgical planning: implications in imaging timing.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Evidence-based dexamethasone dosing in malignant brain tumors: what do we really know?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Review
- Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Gadopiclenol: A New Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelate With High T1 Relaxivity.Investigative radiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Clinical Relevance of Steroid Use in Neuro-Oncology.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017Review
- Corticosteroids for peritumoral edema: time to overcome our addiction?Neuro-oncology · 2016Article
- The Effect of Slice Thickness on Contours of Brain Metastases for Stereotactic Radiosurgery.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- The effect of brain metastasis location on clinical outcomes: A review of the literature.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pretreatment evaluation is performed to determine the number, location, and size of the brain metastases and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the recommended imaging technique, particularly in patients being considered for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery. A contiguous thin-cut volumetric MRI with gadolinium with newer gadolinium-based agents can improve detection of small brain metastases. A systemic workup and medical evaluation are important, given that subsequent treatment for the brain metastases will also depend on the extent of the extracranial disease and on the age and performance status of the patient. Patients with hydrocephalus or impending brain herniation should be started on high doses of corticosteroids and evaluated for possible neurosurgical intervention. Patients with moderate symptoms should receive approximately 4-8 mg/d of dexamethasone in divided doses. The routine use of corticosteroids in patients without neurologic symptoms is not necessary. There is no proven benefit of anticonvulsants in patient without seizures. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.