Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24971144›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2014

A multicentre randomized clinical trial on efficacy and safety of huxin formula in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Huan-Lin Wu, Yun-Fei Wang, Jun-Zhe Li, Min-Zhou Zhang, Xiao-Gang Sheng, Xia Wang, Song Li, Qiu-Xiong Chen, Xiao-Qing Li, Ai-Hua Ou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huan-Lin WuHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Yun-Fei WangHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Jun-Zhe LiHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Min-Zhou ZhangHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Xiao-Gang ShengHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Xia WangHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Song LiHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Qiu-Xiong ChenHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Xiao-Qing LiHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Ai-Hua OuDepartment of DME, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.
Xin-Min RuanHeart Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is widely used in clinical treatment of coronary artery disease. However, the effects of PCI on preventing restenosis after revascularization and improving the quality of life were not satisfying. Huxin Formula is formulated by modifying an experienced Chinese medicine formula and has been widely used in clinical practice due to its marked effects on coronary heart disease. A multicentre double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to evaluate the effects and safety of Huxin Formula in patients undergoing PCI. Our results showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in main outcomes. For patients with ejection fraction (EF) >50%, score of the quality of life scale was higher in treatment group compared with control group. For patients with unstable angina, score of the quality of life scale in 360 days was significantly higher in treatment group compared with control group (P < 0.05). No obvious adverse reaction was found in the use of Huxin Formula. In conclusion, Huxin Formula, believed to be a safe treatment for patients after PCI, has benefits in improving the quality of life in patients with unstable angina though it failed to show superiority in primary and secondary outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID24971144
PMCPMC4058264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.