ReviewOncoTargets and therapy2014
Potential role of daratumumab in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Review in OncoTargets and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Minimal Residual Disease Status to Reduce Uncertainty in Estimating Long-term Survival Outcomes for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2023Article
- Harnessing the T Cell to Treat Multiple Myeloma: Dawn of a New Therapeutic Paradigm.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The Extracellular NADome Modulates Immune Responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Ectonucleotidases in Blood Malignancies: A Tale of Surface Markers and Therapeutic Targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2017Review
- Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Not Just Lineage-Specific Targets.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Novel agents in the treatment of multiple myeloma: a review about the future.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2016Review
- Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in the Context of Multiple Myeloma Treatment.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016Review
- Refractory IgD Multiple Myeloma Treated with Daratumumab: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2016Article
- Targeted Therapies in Adult B-Cell Malignancies.BioMed research international · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy in the US. Treatments utilizing alkylating agents, corticosteroids, proteasome inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs have resulted in significant survival benefits, however, despite the advances, relapse is inevitable. Decreased depth and duration of response obtained with each successive relapse of disease is typical of the disease course, thereby highlighting a continuing need for new treatment options. With the introduction of monoclonal antibodies for multiple myeloma, new options for treatment in the relapsed setting are on the horizon. Among the new immunologic agents is daratumumab (DARA), a humanized antibody to CD38 with potent multifaceted antitumor activity. Phase I and II clinical trials have demonstrated significant reduction in serum M-protein and bone marrow plasma cell percentage in refractory patients, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Moreover, ex vivo studies have shown that DARA may be particularly useful in combination with currently used anti-myeloma agents. With a recent breakthrough drug designation by the US Food and Drug Administration, DARA shows promise as mono- and combination therapy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.