Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970839›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative.

John D D'Amore, Joshua C Mandel, David A Kreda, Ashley Swain, George A Koromia, Sumesh Sundareswaran, Liora Alschuler, Robert H Dolin, Kenneth D Mandl, Isaac S Kohane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The standard problem.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adapting a System-Theoretic Hazard Analysis Method for the Analysis of an eHealth Interoperability Conformance Profile.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John D D'AmoreLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA Diameter Health, Inc., Newton, Massachusetts, USA.
Joshua C MandelChildren's Hospital Informatics Program at Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David A KredaSMART Platforms Project, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ashley SwainLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA.
George A KoromiaLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA.
Sumesh SundareswaranLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA.
Liora AlschulerLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA.
Robert H DolinLantana Consulting Group, LLC, East Thetford, Vermont, USA.
Kenneth D MandlChildren's Hospital Informatics Program at Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Isaac S KohaneChildren's Hospital Informatics Program at Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachel B RamoniCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Oral Health Policy and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
NCATS NIH HHS 90TR000101NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveUpgrades to electronic health record (EHR) systems scheduled to be introduced in the USA in 2014 will advance document interoperability between care providers. Specifically, the second stage of the federal incentive program for EHR adoption, known as Meaningful Use, requires use of the Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) for document exchange. In an effort to examine and improve C-CDA based exchange, the SMART (Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technology) C-CDA Collaborative brought together a group of certified EHR and other health information technology vendors. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe examined the machine-readable content of collected samples for semantic correctness and consistency. This included parsing with the open-source BlueButton.js tool, testing with a validator used in EHR certification, scoring with an automated open-source tool, and manual inspection. We also conducted group and individual review sessions with participating vendors to understand their interpretation of C-CDA specifications and requirements.

resultsWe contacted 107 health information technology organizations and collected 91 C-CDA sample documents from 21 distinct technologies. Manual and automated document inspection led to 615 observations of errors and data expression variation across represented technologies. Based upon our analysis and vendor discussions, we identified 11 specific areas that represent relevant barriers to the interoperability of C-CDA documents.

conclusionsWe identified errors and permissible heterogeneity in C-CDA documents that will limit semantic interoperability. Our findings also point to several practical opportunities to improve C-CDA document quality and exchange in the coming years.

Indexed as

Meaningful UseMedical Record LinkageCertificationDiffusion of InnovationElectronic Health RecordsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedSystems IntegrationUnited StatesC-CDAData ExchangeEHRInteroperabilityMeaningful Use

Identifiers

PMID24970839
PMCPMC4215060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.