Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970570›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Stoma-Const--the technical aspects of stoma construction: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Adiela Correa Marinez, Sofia Erestam, Eva Haglind, Jan Ekelund, Ulf Angerås, Jacob Rosenberg, Frederik Helgstrand, Eva Angenete

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01694238 (Circular, Mesh Enforced or Cruciate Incision in the Abdominal Wall Fascia for coloStomy Construction - A Randomised Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01694238 nacompletednot on this map

Circular, Mesh Enforced or Cruciate Incision in the Abdominal Wall Fascia for coloStomy Construction - A Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSahlgrenska University HospitalRan2013 to 2018Enrolled209ConditionsColostomy, Colorectal Neoplasm, DiverticulitisArmsCruciate incision, Circular incision, Mesh enforced cruciate incision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ostomy-Related Complications.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2019
    Review
  6. Technical Considerations in Stoma Creation.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  7. Parastomal hernia and prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation: a commentary.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adiela Correa Marinez
Sofia Erestam
Eva Haglind
Jan Ekelund
Ulf Angerås
Jacob Rosenberg
Frederik Helgstrand
Eva AngeneteDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, 416 85 Gothenburg, Sweden. eva.angenete@vgregion.se.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital · SEHerlev Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe construction of a colostomy is a common procedure, but the evidence for the different parts of the construction of the colostomy is lacking. Parastomal hernia is a common complication of colostomy formation. The aim of this study is to standardise the colostomy formation and to compare three types of colostomy formation (one including a mesh) regarding the development of parastomal hernia. METHODS/

designStoma-Const is a Scandinavian randomised trial comparing three types of colostomy formation. The primary endpoint is parastomal herniation as shown by clinical examination or CT scan within one year. Secondary endpoints are re-admission rate, postoperative complications (classified according to Clavien-Dindo), stoma-related complications (registered in the case record form at stoma care nurse follow-up), total length of hospital stay during 12 months, health-related quality of life and health economic analysis as well as re-operation rate and mortality within 30 days and 12 months of primary surgery. Follow-up is scheduled at 4-6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months. Inclusion is set at 240 patients. DISCUSSION: Parastomal hernia is a common complication after colostomy formation. Several studies have been performed with the aim to reduce the rate of this complication. However, none are fully conclusive and data on quality of life and health economy are lacking. The aim of this study is to develop new standardised techniques for colostomy formation and evaluate this with patient reported outcomes as well as clinical and radiological assessment.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01694238.2012-09-24.

Indexed as

Research DesignClinical ProtocolsColostomyHealth Care CostsHernia, AbdominalHumansLength of StayPatient ReadmissionQuality of LifeRisk FactorsSurgical MeshSwedenTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24970570
PMCPMC4094442
OpenAlexW2106956288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.