Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970453›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2014

Facial expression judgments support a socio-relational model, rather than a negativity bias model of political psychology.

Jacob M Vigil, Chance Strenth

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob M VigilDepartment of Psychology,University of New Mexico,Albuquerque, NM 87131-1161.vigilj@unm.eduhttp://www.unm.edu/~psych/faculty/sm_vigil.htmlcstrenth@unm.edu.
Chance StrenthDepartment of Psychology,University of New Mexico,Albuquerque, NM 87131-1161.vigilj@unm.eduhttp://www.unm.edu/~psych/faculty/sm_vigil.htmlcstrenth@unm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-reported opinions and judgments may be more rooted in expressive biases than in cognitive processing biases, and ultimately operate within a broader behavioral style for advertising the capacity - versus the trustworthiness - dimension of human reciprocity potential. Our analyses of facial expression judgments of likely voters are consistent with this thesis, and directly contradict one major prediction from the authors' "negativity-bias" model.

Indexed as

AttitudeIndividualityModels, PsychologicalPoliticsHumansPersonality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.