Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970431›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2014

The negativity bias: conceptualization, quantification, and individual differences.

John T Cacioppo, Stephanie Cacioppo, Jackie K Gollan

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John T CacioppoCenter for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience,University of Chicago,Chicago,IL 60637.Cacioppo@uchicago.eduhttp://psychology.uchicago.edu/people/faculty/cacioppo/index.shtml.
Stephanie CacioppoHigh Performance Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory,University of Chicago,Chicago,IL 60637.Cacioppos@uchicago.eduhttps://hpenlaboratory.uchicago.edu/node.
Jackie K GollanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University,Chicago,IL 60611.j-gollan@northwestern.eduhttp://fsmweb.northwestern.edu/faculty/FacultyProfile.cfm?xid=16087.

Funding

Translating Affective Science to Predict Outcomes of Behavioral Treatment for MDDR21MH082133 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLLAN, JACQUELINE K · 2009 to 2010
$433k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH082133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an extensive literature on the negativity bias, including its conceptualization, measurement, temporal stability (individual differences), and neural and genetic associations. Hibbing et al. posit that the difference across individuals in the negativity bias is a key factor in determining political predisposition. The measures and paradigms developed in this literature provide a means of testing this hypothesis.

Indexed as

AttitudeIndividualityModels, PsychologicalPoliticsHumansPersonality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.