Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970429›Full record

ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2014

Liberals and conservatives can show similarities in negativity bias.

Mark J Brandt, Geoffrey Wetherell, Christine Reyna

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is negativity bias intuitive for liberals and conservatives?Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark J BrandtDepartment of Social Psychology,Tilburg University,Tilburg 5000 LE,Netherlands.m.j.brandt@tilburguniversity.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/brandtmj/
Geoffrey WetherellDepartment of Psychology,DePaul University,Chicago,IL 60614-3504.gwethere@depaul.eduhttp://www.geoffreywetherell.com/creyna@depaul.eduhttp://socialpsychologydepaul.wordpress.com/
Christine ReynaDepartment of Psychology,DePaul University,Chicago,IL 60614-3504.gwethere@depaul.eduhttp://www.geoffreywetherell.com/creyna@depaul.eduhttp://socialpsychologydepaul.wordpress.com/

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negativity bias may underlie the development of political ideologies, but liberals and conservatives are likely to respond to threats similarly. We review evidence from research on intolerance, motivated reasoning, and basic psychological threats that suggest liberals and conservatives are more similar than different when confronting threatening groups, situations, and information.

Indexed as

AttitudeIndividualityModels, PsychologicalPoliticsHumansPersonality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.