Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970349›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2014

Physiologically based absorption modelling to predict the impact of drug properties on pharmacokinetics of bitopertin.

Neil Parrott, Dominik Hainzl, Emmanuel Scheubel, Siegfried Krimmer, Christophe Boetsch, Elena Guerini, Meret Martin-Facklam

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Pharmacokinetic profile of bitopertin, a selective GlyTNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neil ParrottPharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Bau 70/130 Grenzacherstrasse, Basel, Switzerland, neil_john.parrott@roche.com.
Dominik Hainzl
Emmanuel Scheubel
Siegfried Krimmer
Christophe Boetsch
Elena Guerini
Meret Martin-Facklam
Roche (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bitopertin (RG1678) is a glycine reuptake inhibitor in phase 3 trials for treatment of schizophrenia. Its clinical oral pharmacokinetics is sensitive to changes in drug substance particle size and dosage form. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption model simulations of the impact of changes in particle size and dosage form (either capsules, tablets, or an aqueous suspension) on oral pharmacokinetics was verified by comparison to measured plasma concentrations. Then, a model parameter sensitivity analysis was applied to set limits on the particle sizes included in tablets for the market. The model was also used to explore the in vitro to in vivo correlation. Simulated changes in oral pharmacokinetics caused by differences in particle size and dosage form were confirmed in two separate relative bioavailability studies. Model parameter sensitivity analyses predicted that AUCinf was hardly reduced as long as particle diameter (D50) remained smaller than 30 μm, and >20% reduced Cmax is anticipated only when particle diameter exceeds 15 μm. An exploration of the sensitivity to the presence of larger particles within a polydisperse distribution showed that simulated Cmax is again more affected than AUC but is less than 20% reduced as long as D50 is less than 8 μm and D90 is smaller than 56 μm. PBPK absorption modelling can contribute to a quality by design (QbD) approach for clinical formulation development and support the setting of biorelevant specifications for release of the product.

Indexed as

Gastric AbsorptionIntestinal AbsorptionAdministration, OralAdultAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBiological AvailabilityCapsulesChemistry, PharmaceuticalComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMacaca fascicularisMaleMiddle AgedModels, Animal(4-(3-fluoro-5-trifluoromethylpyridin-2-yl)piperazin-1-yl)(5-methanesulfonyl-2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-1-methylethoxy)phenyl)methanoneAntipsychotic AgentsCapsulesPharmaceutical SolutionsPiperazinesSulfonesTablets

Identifiers

PMID24970349
PMCPMC4147056
OpenAlexW2114183363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.