Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970232›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2014

Modelling proteasome and proteasome regulator activities.

Juliane Liepe, Herman-Georg Holzhütter, Peter M Kloetzel, Michael P H Stumpf, Michele Mishto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of the Proteasome in Platelet Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliane LiepeTheoretical Systems Biology, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. juliane.liepe08@imperial.ac.uk.
Herman-Georg HolzhütterInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. hergo@charite.de.
Peter M KloetzelInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. p-m.kloetzel@charite.de.
Michael P H StumpfTheoretical Systems Biology, Division of Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. m.stumpf@imperial.ac.uk.
Michele MishtoInstitute of Biochemistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany. michele.mishto@charite.de.

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K001949/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteasomes are key proteases involved in a variety of processes ranging from the clearance of damaged proteins to the presentation of antigens to CD8+ T-lymphocytes. Which cleavage sites are used within the target proteins and how fast these proteins are degraded have a profound impact on immune system function and many cellular metabolic processes. The regulation of proteasome activity involves different mechanisms, such as the substitution of the catalytic subunits, the binding of regulatory complexes to proteasome gates and the proteasome conformational modifications triggered by the target protein itself. Mathematical models are invaluable in the analysis; and potentially allow us to predict the complex interactions of proteasome regulatory mechanisms and the final outcomes of the protein degradation rate and MHC class I epitope generation. The pioneering attempts that have been made to mathematically model proteasome activity, cleavage preference variation and their modification by one of the regulatory mechanisms are reviewed here.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsHumansHydrolysisOligopeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexOligopeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase Complex

Identifiers

PMID24970232
PMCPMC4101499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.