Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24970225›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2014

Chaperonin GroEL reassembly: an effect of protein ligands and solvent composition.

Nataliya Ryabova, Victor Marchenkov, Nina Kotova, Gennady Semisotnov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nataliya RyabovaInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya Street 4, Pushchino 142290, Russia. ryabova@phys.protres.ru.
Victor MarchenkovInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya Street 4, Pushchino 142290, Russia. march@phys.protres.ru.
Nina KotovaInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya Street 4, Pushchino 142290, Russia. nina@alpha.protres.ru.
Gennady SemisotnovInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya Street 4, Pushchino 142290, Russia. nina@vega.protres.ru.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55005607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chaperonin GroEL is a complex oligomeric heat shock protein (Hsp60) assisting the correct folding and assembly of other proteins in the cell. An intriguing question is how GroEL folds itself. According to the literature, GroEL reassembly is dependent on chaperonin ligands and solvent composition. Here we demonstrate dependence of GroEL reassembly efficiency on concentrations of the essential factors (Mg2+, ADP, ATP, GroES, ammonium sulfate, NaCl and glycerol). Besides, kinetics of GroEL oligomerization in various conditions was monitored by the light scattering technique and proved to be two-exponential, which suggested accumulation of a certain oligomeric intermediate. This intermediate was resolved as a heptamer by nondenaturing blue electrophoresis of GroEL monomers during their assembly in the presence of both Mg-ATP and co-chaperonin GroES. Presumably, this intermediate heptamer plays a key role in formation of the GroEL tetradecameric particle. The role of co-chaperonin GroES (Hsp10) in GroEL assembly is also discussed.

Indexed as

Adenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAmmonium SulfateChaperonin 60Dose-Response Relationship, DrugKineticsLigandsMagnesiumProtein MultimerizationProtein RefoldingProtein Structure, QuaternarySolventsAdenosine DiphosphateAdenosine TriphosphateAmmonium SulfateChaperonin 60LigandsMagnesiumSolvents

Identifiers

PMID24970225
PMCPMC4101492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.