ArticleHeart and vessels2015
A differentiated morphological parameter-coding system to describe the suitability of mitral valve stenoses intended for percutaneous valvotomy.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous balloon-mitral-valvotomy (PBMV) is an alternative to surgery in selected patients with mitral valve (MV) stenosis (MS). Applying echocardiography, suitability for PBMV is assessed by detailed morphological description. Echo-scores alone are suboptimal to describe MV morphology, because single parameters, important for a decision concerning PBMV, are not distinguishable out of a score number. The aim was to design a tool (coding-system), which combines a number for a stenotic MV like scores (for statistical options) and decodable, generally applied parameters describing the MS morphology. The reproducibility of the MS morphology using the coding-system has to be tested in 90 patients. A separate group of 297 patients (pts) with MS, scheduled for PBMV, should be investigated prospectively applying the coding-system and a comparable score. We chose the Wilkins score (WS) as representative of scores. The coding-system is designed as a parameter sequencing set consisting of 6 digits. The first digit indicates a decision code concerning suitability for PBMV. The following 5 digits indicate generally accepted morphological parameters, which are partially also used in the WS. Therefore, the MS morphology can be "read" retrospectively by decoding. 201/297 patients were found suitable for PBMV. Applying the coding-system all 201 suitable patients were correctly distinguished from 96 morphologically unsuitable patients. Astonishingly 48/96 of the rejected patients showed a WS ≤8 whereas 28/201 of the suitable patients demonstrated a WS >8. 25/28 of them showed a successful initial outcome. Applying the generally known threshold of "8" when predicting suitability of a MS, the WS demonstrated an initial success rate of 62 %, sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.45, precision of 0.79, and accuracy of 0.78. Applying the coding-system, the initial success rate was 70.8 %, sensitivity = 0.96, specificity = 1.0, precision = 1.0, and accuracy = 0.97. The coding-system is an advanced diagnostic aid, is statistically applicable, offers a decodable morphological description, includes a decision code regarding suitability for PBMV, and can be used for comparing different groups of patients with MS by calculating "mean morphologies" of groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.