Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24969352›Full record

Trial reportMaternal and child health journal2015

Effects of a psychosocial couple-based prevention program on adverse birth outcomes.

Mark E Feinberg, Michael E Roettger, Damon E Jones, Ian M Paul, Marni L Kan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Maternal and child health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Double Impact: A Dyadic Discrimination Model for Poor, Minority, and Pregnant Couples.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark E FeinbergPrevention Research Center, Penn State University, 314 Biobehavioral Health, University Park, PA, 16802, USA, mef11@psu.edu.
Michael E Roettger
Damon E Jones
Ian M Paul
Marni L Kan
Neurobehavioral Systems · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USRTI International · US

Funding

DEVELOPING FAMILY-FOCUSED PREVENTIONS: COPARENTINGK23HD042575 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2003 to 2007
$590k
Promotion of Coparenting During Family Formation PeriodR21MH064125 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2003 to 2005
$468k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD042575NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH064125NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH064125-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although maternal stress and depression have been linked to adverse birth outcomes (ABOs), few studies have investigated preventive interventions targeting maternal mental health as a means of reducing ABOs. This randomized controlled study examines the impact of Family Foundations (FF)-a transition to parenthood program for couples focused on promoting coparenting quality, with previously documented impact on maternal stress and depression-on ABOs. We also examine whether intervention buffers birth outcomes from the negative effect of elevated salivary cortisol levels. We use intent-to-treat analyses to assess the main effects of the FF intervention on ABOs (prematurity, birth weight, pregnancy complications, Cesarean section, and days in hospital for mothers and infants) among 148 expectant mothers. We also test the interaction of cortisol with intervention condition status in predicting ABOs. FF participation was associated with reduced risk of C-section (OR .357, p < 0.05, 95 % CI 0.149, 0.862), but did not have main effects on other ABOs. FF significantly buffered (p < 0.05) the negative impact of maternal cortisol on birth weight, gestational age, and days in hospital for infants; that is, among women with relatively higher levels of prenatal cortisol, the intervention reduced ABOs. These results demonstrate that a psycho-educational program for couples reduces incidence of ABOs among higher risk women. Future work should test whether reduced maternal stress and depression mediate these intervention effects.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultBirth WeightCesarean SectionDepressionFemaleGestational AgeHealth PromotionHospitalizationHumansHydrocortisoneIntention to Treat AnalysisInterviews as TopicMaleMothersParentingHydrocortisone

Identifiers

PMID24969352
PMCPMC4321726
OpenAlexW2027477686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.