ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2014
Cardiac sarcoidosis.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Atrial Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Case Presentation and Systematic Review.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Pooled it
- Trends and Disparities in Cardiovascular Death in Sarcoidosis: A Population-Based Retrospective Study in the United States From 1999 to 2020.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Current uses and understanding of PET imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Review
- PET Imaging in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Narrative Review with Focus on Novel PET Tracers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Clinical Presentation and Treatment of High-Risk Sarcoidosis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2021Review
- Cardiac Involvement In Multiorgan Sarcoidosis: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications.Cureus · 2020Article
- Sarcoidosis: Pitfalls and Challenging Mimickers.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Review
- Echocardiography in Sarcoidosis.Current cardiology reports · 2018Review
- Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-indeterminate/negative cardiac sarcoidosis revealed byJournal of medical case reports · 2017Review
- Article
- Editorial: Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis - What is the role of endomyocardial biopsy?Journal of cardiology cases · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare and under-recognized clinical entity that requires a high level of suspicion and low threshold for screening in order to make the diagnosis. CS may manifest in a variety of ways, and its initial presentation can range from asymptomatic electrocardiographic abnormalities to overt heart failure to sudden cardiac death. The aim of this literature review is to provide a comprehensive overview of CS, with an emphasis on clinical manifestations and special diagnostic and management considerations, while highlighting recent studies that have provided new insights into this unique disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24969032What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.