Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24968993›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2014

Cost-effectiveness of a computerized provider order entry system in improving medication safety ambulatory care.

Sara H Forrester, Zsolt Hepp, Joshua A Roth, Heidi S Wirtz, Emily Beth Devine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A balancing act: the promise and pitfalls of clinical decision support.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Lessons Learned When Introducing Pharmacogenomic Panel Testing into Clinical Practice.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara H ForresterPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zsolt HeppPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joshua A RothPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA.
Heidi S WirtzPharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emily Beth DevinePharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: bdevine@uw.edu.

Funding

Health Care Improvement for Aging WomenT32AG027677 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
Evaluating e-Prescribing in a Community-based, Integrated Health SystemK08HS014739 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEVINE, EMILY BETH · 2006 to 2010
$510k
AHRQ HHS 5K08HS014739AHRQ HHS K08 HS014739NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027677NIA NIH HHS T32AG027677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) is the process of entering physician orders directly into an electronic health record. Although CPOE has been shown to improve medication safety and reduce health care costs, these improvements have been demonstrated largely in the inpatient setting; the cost-effectiveness in the ambulatory setting remains uncertain.

objectiveThe objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CPOE in reducing medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) in the ambulatory setting.

methodsWe created a decision-analytic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of CPOE in a midsized (400 providers) multidisciplinary medical group over a 5-year time horizon- 2010 to 2014-the time frame during which health systems are implementing CPOE to meet Meaningful Use criteria. We adopted the medical group's perspective and utilized their costs, changes in efficiency, and actual number of medication errors and ADEs. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Scenario analyses were explored.

resultsIn the base case, CPOE dominated paper prescribing, that is, CPOE cost $18 million less than paper prescribing, and was associated with 1.5 million and 14,500 fewer medication errors and ADEs, respectively, over 5 years. In the scenario that reflected a practice group of five providers, CPOE cost $265,000 less than paper prescribing, was associated with 3875 and 39 fewer medication errors and ADEs, respectively, over 5 years, and was dominant in 80% of the simulations.

conclusionsOur model suggests that the adoption of CPOE in the ambulatory setting provides excellent value for the investment, and is a cost-effective strategy to improve medication safety over a wide range of practice sizes.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAmbulatory CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMeaningful UseMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication ErrorsWashingtonadverse drug eventsambulatory carecomputerized physician order entry systemcost-benefit analysis (cost-effectiveness)medication errors

Identifiers

PMID24968993
PMCPMC4079669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.