Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24968876›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2014

Second brain tumors following central nervous system radiotherapy in childhood.

M Chojnacka, K Pędziwiatr, A Skowrońska-Gardas, M Perek-Polnik, D Perek, P Olasek

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Risks of leukemia, intracranial tumours and lymphomas in childhood and early adulthood after pediatric radiation exposure from computed tomography.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Chojnacka1 Department of Radiotherapy, M. Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center-Institute, Warsaw, Wawelska, Poland.
K Pędziwiatr
A Skowrońska-Gardas
M Perek-Polnik
D Perek
P Olasek
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe second tumour (ST) occurrence is a relatively uncommon late complication of radiotherapy but represents one of the most significant issues, especially in childhood oncology. We describe our experience with patients who developed second brain neoplasm following cranial irradiation in childhood.

methodsWe identified nine patients who received radiotherapy owing to central nervous system tumour in childhood and subsequently developed the second brain tumour. The full clinical and radiological documentation and histopathological reports were reviewed. Risk factors such as age at irradiation, latency period to ST diagnosis, radiotherapy doses and volumes and other therapy methods were evaluated. We correlated the ST location with the three levels of irradiation dose (high, >40 Gy; medium, 25-40 Gy; and low <25 Gy).

resultsFive meningiomas and four gliomas occurred as the ST after the mean time of 11.7 years after radiotherapy. The average age of children during irradiation was 4.6 years. The shorter latency time to the ST induction was found in children treated with chemotherapy (9 years vs 17.2 years). Seven STs developed in the area of high and moderate dose (>25 Gy), only two low-grade gliomas appeared in the low-dose region.

conclusionOur data suggest that the STs usually develop in the brain tissues that received doses >25 Gy in patients irradiated at a young age. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The low-dose volume seems not to be so significant for second brain neoplasm induction. Therefore, the modern intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique could be safely applied in paediatric patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyCranial IrradiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleGliomaHumansInfantMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID24968876
PMCPMC4453152
OpenAlexW1967802639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.