Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24968788›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2014

Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Andrzej Kotela, Ireneusz Kotela

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Accuracy of tibial cuts with patient-specific instrumentation is not influenced by the surgeon's level of experience.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej KotelaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Central Research Hospital of Ministry of Interior, Wołoska 137, 02-507, Warszawa, Poland, andrzejkotela@op.pl.
Ireneusz Kotela
Jan Kochanowski University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare radiological results of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed with patient-specific computed tomography (CT)-based instrumentation and conventional technique. The main study hypothesis was that CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) increases the accuracy of TKA.

methodsA prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out between January and December 2011. A group of 112 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to an experimental or control group. The experimental group comprised 52 patients operated on with the aid of the Signature CT-based implant positioning system. The control group consisted of 60 patients operated on using conventional instrumentation. The radiographic evaluation of implant positioning and overall coronal alignment was performed 12 months after the surgery by using standing anteroposterior radiographs of the entire lower limb and standard lateral radiographs.

resultsOf the 112 patients initially enrolled for the study, 95 were included in the subsequent analyses. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect to coronal and sagittal component positioning and overall coronal alignment, except for frontal tibial component positioning. For this parameter, better results were obtained in the control group, with borderline statistical significance.

conclusionsOur study did not reveal superiority of the CT-based PSI system over conventional instrumentation. Further high-quality investigations of patient-specific systems are absolutely indispensable to assess their utility for TKA. In our opinion, the surgeon applying PSI technology is required to have advanced knowledge and considerable experience with the conventional method.

Indexed as

Surgery, Computer-AssistedAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePatient-Specific ModelingProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID24968788
OpenAlexW2078568880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.