ArticlePLoS genetics2014
Ex uno plures: clonal reinforcement drives evolution of a simple microbial community.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel but distinct adaptive routes in the budding and fission yeasts after 10,000 generations of experimental evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Frequency-dependent fitness effects are ubiquitous.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Adaptive genetics reveals constraints on protein structure/function by evolving E. coli under constant nutrient limitation.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Emergence and maintenance of stable coexistence during a long-term multicellular evolution experiment.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Rediversification following ecotype isolation reveals hidden adaptive potential.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Quantifying the local adaptive landscape of a nascent bacterial community.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Evolutionary dynamics and structural consequences of de novo beneficial mutations and mutant lineages arising in a constant environment.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Metabolic modelling approaches for describing and engineering microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Article
- Acetate and glycerol are not uniquely suited for the evolution of cross-feeding in E. coli.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Contingent evolution of alternative metabolic network topologies determines whether cross-feeding evolves.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Fitness and Productivity Increase with Ecotypic Diversity amongApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- Pseudomonad reverse carbon catabolite repression, interspecies metabolite exchange, and consortial division of labor.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
- Negative frequency-dependent selection maintains coexisting genotypes during fluctuating selection.Molecular ecology · 2020Article
- Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2018Review
- An enormous potential for niche construction through bacterial cross-feeding in a homogeneous environment.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Inactivation of Transcriptional Regulators during Within-Household Evolution of Escherichia coli.Journal of bacteriology · 2017Article
- Stability of Cross-Feeding Polymorphisms in Microbial Communities.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Rapid radiation in bacteria leads to a division of labour.Nature communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A major goal of genetics is to define the relationship between phenotype and genotype, while a major goal of ecology is to identify the rules that govern community assembly. Achieving these goals by analyzing natural systems can be difficult, as selective pressures create dynamic fitness landscapes that vary in both space and time. Laboratory experimental evolution offers the benefit of controlling variables that shape fitness landscapes, helping to achieve both goals. We previously showed that a clonal population of E. coli experimentally evolved under continuous glucose limitation gives rise to a genetically diverse community consisting of one clone, CV103, that best scavenges but incompletely utilizes the limiting resource, and others, CV101 and CV116, that consume its overflow metabolites. Because this community can be disassembled and reassembled, and involves cooperative interactions that are stable over time, its genetic diversity is sustained by clonal reinforcement rather than by clonal interference. To understand the genetic factors that produce this outcome, and to illuminate the community's underlying physiology, we sequenced the genomes of ancestral and evolved clones. We identified ancestral mutations in intermediary metabolism that may have predisposed the evolution of metabolic interdependence. Phylogenetic reconstruction indicates that the lineages that gave rise to this community diverged early, as CV103 shares only one Single Nucleotide Polymorphism with the other evolved clones. Underlying CV103's phenotype we identified a set of mutations that likely enhance glucose scavenging and maintain redox balance, but may do so at the expense of carbon excreted in overflow metabolites. Because these overflow metabolites serve as growth substrates that are differentially accessible to the other community members, and because the scavenging lineage shares only one SNP with these other clones, we conclude that this lineage likely served as an "engine" generating diversity by creating new metabolic niches, but not the occupants themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.