Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24968166›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Reviving the dead: history and reactivation of an extinct l1.

Lei Yang, John Brunsfeld, LuAnn Scott, Holly Wichman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Science advances · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative genomic analyses illuminate the distinct evolution of megabats within Chiroptera.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Centromeric enrichment of LINE-1 retrotransposons and its significance for the chromosome evolution of Phyllostomid bats.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Evolution of LINE-1 in Vertebrates.Genome biology and evolution · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei YangDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America; Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
John BrunsfeldDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
LuAnn ScottDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
Holly WichmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America; Institute for Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Studies, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, United States of America.
University of Idaho · US

Funding

Women's health: interplay of maternal diet and key demographics on neurological health in the rural frontier and remote WestP20GM103408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI Scott A Minnich · 2012 to 2026
$59.8M
Genomics Resources Core (GRC)P30GM103324 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI FORNEY, LARRY J · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
MAMMALIAN GENOMES--STASIS AND CHANGER01GM038727 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI WICHMAN, HOLLY A · 1993 to 2009
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM103324NIGMS NIH HHS GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103408NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103324NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM038727NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM38727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although L1 sequences are present in the genomes of all placental mammals and marsupials examined to date, their activity was lost in the megabat family, Pteropodidae, ∼24 million years ago. To examine the characteristics of L1s prior to their extinction, we analyzed the evolutionary history of L1s in the genome of a megabat, Pteropus vampyrus, and found a pattern of periodic L1 expansion and quiescence. In contrast to the well-characterized L1s in human and mouse, megabat genomes have accommodated two or more simultaneously active L1 families throughout their evolutionary history, and major peaks of L1 deposition into the genome always involved multiple families. We compared the consensus sequences of the two major megabat L1 families at the time of their extinction to consensus L1s of a variety of mammalian species. Megabat L1s are comparable to the other mammalian L1s in terms of adenosine content and conserved amino acids in the open reading frames (ORFs). However, the intergenic region (IGR) of the reconstructed element from the more active family is dramatically longer than the IGR of well-characterized human and mouse L1s. We synthesized the reconstructed element from this L1 family and tested the ability of its components to support retrotransposition in a tissue culture assay. Both ORFs are capable of supporting retrotransposition, while the IGR is inhibitory to retrotransposition, especially when combined with either of the reconstructed ORFs. We dissected the inhibitory effect of the IGR by testing truncated and shuffled versions and found that length is a key factor, but not the only one affecting inhibition of retrotransposition. Although the IGR is inhibitory to retrotransposition, this inhibition does not account for the extinction of L1s in megabats. Overall, the evolution of the L1 sequence or the quiescence of L1 is unlikely the reason of L1 extinction.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsChiropteraDNA, IntergenicGenomeHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceOpen Reading FramesDNA, Intergenic

Identifiers

PMID24968166
PMCPMC4072516
OpenAlexW2068405192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.