Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967937›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis.

Yann S Dufour, Xiongfei Fu, Luis Hernandez-Nunez, Thierry Emonet

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Growth-dependent sensory bet-hedging enhances collective navigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The dynamic response of the bacterial flagellar motor to its direct intracellular input signal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nongenetic adaptation by collective migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Collective behavior and nongenetic inheritance allow bacterial populations to adapt to changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yann S DufourDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Xiongfei FuDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Luis Hernandez-NunezDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Thierry EmonetDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America; Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

The contribution of phenotypic variability to chemotactic performanceR01GM106189 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI EMONET, THIERRY · 2013 to 2022
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106189NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM106189-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inputs to signaling pathways can have complex statistics that depend on the environment and on the behavioral response to previous stimuli. Such behavioral feedback is particularly important in navigation. Successful navigation relies on proper coupling between sensors, which gather information during motion, and actuators, which control behavior. Because reorientation conditions future inputs, behavioral feedback can place sensors and actuators in an operational regime different from the resting state. How then can organisms maintain proper information transfer through the pathway while navigating diverse environments? In bacterial chemotaxis, robust performance is often attributed to the zero integral feedback control of the sensor, which guarantees that activity returns to resting state when the input remains constant. While this property provides sensitivity over a wide range of signal intensities, it remains unclear how other parameters such as adaptation rate and adapted activity affect chemotactic performance, especially when considering that the swimming behavior of the cell determines the input signal. We examine this issue using analytical models and simulations that incorporate recent experimental evidences about behavioral feedback and flagellar motor adaptation. By focusing on how sensory information carried by the response regulator is best utilized by the motor, we identify an operational regime that maximizes drift velocity along chemical concentration gradients for a wide range of environments and sensor adaptation rates. This optimal regime is outside the dynamic range of the motor response, but maximizes the contrast between run duration up and down gradients. In steep gradients, the feedback from chemotactic drift can push the system through a bifurcation. This creates a non-chemotactic state that traps cells unless the motor is allowed to adapt. Although motor adaptation helps, we find that as the strength of the feedback increases individual phenotypes cannot maintain the optimal operational regime in all environments, suggesting that diversity could be beneficial.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial ProteinsChemotaxisComputational BiologyEscherichia coliFeedback, PhysiologicalMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis ProteinsPhenotypeSignal TransductionBacterial ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMethyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24967937
PMCPMC4072517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.