ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Limits of feedback control in bacterial chemotaxis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Growth-dependent sensory bet-hedging enhances collective navigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Physical embodiment enables information processing beyond explicit flow sensing in active matter.Science advances · 2026Article
- The dynamic response of the bacterial flagellar motor to its direct intracellular input signal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Spontaneous switching in a protein signalling array reveals near-critical cooperativity.Nature physics · 2026Article
- Navigating bacterial motility through chemotaxis: from molecular mechanisms to physiological perspectives.Folia microbiologica · 2025Review
- Nongenetic adaptation by collective migration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Signal integration and adaptive sensory diversity tuning in Escherichia coli chemotaxis.Cell systems · 2024Article
- MotGen: a closed-loop bacterial motility control framework using generative adversarial networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Flagellar dynamics reveal fluctuations and kinetic limit in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Steady-state running rate sets the speed and accuracy of accumulation of swimming bacteria.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- The dopamine circuit as a reward-taxis navigation system.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Collective behavior and nongenetic inheritance allow bacterial populations to adapt to changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- A biophysical threshold for biofilm formation.eLife · 2022Article
- The Effect of the Second Messenger c-di-GMP on Bacterial Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Influence of confinement on the spreading of bacterial populations.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Chemotactic smoothing of collective migration.eLife · 2022Article
- Bacterial Proprioception: Can a Bacterium Sense Its Movement?Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Escherichia coli chemotaxis is information limited.Nature physics · 2021Article
- Multiple functions of flagellar motility and chemotaxis in bacterial physiology.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inputs to signaling pathways can have complex statistics that depend on the environment and on the behavioral response to previous stimuli. Such behavioral feedback is particularly important in navigation. Successful navigation relies on proper coupling between sensors, which gather information during motion, and actuators, which control behavior. Because reorientation conditions future inputs, behavioral feedback can place sensors and actuators in an operational regime different from the resting state. How then can organisms maintain proper information transfer through the pathway while navigating diverse environments? In bacterial chemotaxis, robust performance is often attributed to the zero integral feedback control of the sensor, which guarantees that activity returns to resting state when the input remains constant. While this property provides sensitivity over a wide range of signal intensities, it remains unclear how other parameters such as adaptation rate and adapted activity affect chemotactic performance, especially when considering that the swimming behavior of the cell determines the input signal. We examine this issue using analytical models and simulations that incorporate recent experimental evidences about behavioral feedback and flagellar motor adaptation. By focusing on how sensory information carried by the response regulator is best utilized by the motor, we identify an operational regime that maximizes drift velocity along chemical concentration gradients for a wide range of environments and sensor adaptation rates. This optimal regime is outside the dynamic range of the motor response, but maximizes the contrast between run duration up and down gradients. In steep gradients, the feedback from chemotactic drift can push the system through a bifurcation. This creates a non-chemotactic state that traps cells unless the motor is allowed to adapt. Although motor adaptation helps, we find that as the strength of the feedback increases individual phenotypes cannot maintain the optimal operational regime in all environments, suggesting that diversity could be beneficial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.