Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967846›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Genome-wide prediction and validation of peptides that bind human prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins.

Joe DeBartolo, Mikko Taipale, Amy E Keating

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Learning the language of antibody hypervariability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual RNA Sequencing Reveals Key Events When DifferentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Peptide design by optimization on a data-parameterized protein interaction landscape.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. AB-Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joe DeBartoloMIT Department of Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mikko TaipaleMIT Department of Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Amy E KeatingMIT Department of Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
IIT@MIT · US

Funding

Analysis and design of interaction specifically in proteins regulating apoptosisR01GM084181 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KEATING, AMY E · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM084181NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Programmed cell death is regulated by interactions between pro-apoptotic and prosurvival members of the Bcl-2 family. Pro-apoptotic family members contain a weakly conserved BH3 motif that can adopt an alpha-helical structure and bind to a groove on prosurvival partners Bcl-xL, Bcl-w, Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bfl-1. Peptides corresponding to roughly 13 reported BH3 motifs have been verified to bind in this manner. Due to their short lengths and low sequence conservation, BH3 motifs are not detected using standard sequence-based bioinformatics approaches. Thus, it is possible that many additional proteins harbor BH3-like sequences that can mediate interactions with the Bcl-2 family. In this work, we used structure-based and data-based Bcl-2 interaction models to find new BH3-like peptides in the human proteome. We used peptide SPOT arrays to test candidate peptides for interaction with one or more of the prosurvival proteins Bcl-xL, Bcl-w, Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bfl-1. For the 36 most promising array candidates, we quantified binding to all five human receptors using direct and competition binding assays in solution. All 36 peptides showed evidence of interaction with at least one prosurvival protein, and 22 peptides bound at least one prosurvival protein with a dissociation constant between 1 and 500 nM; many peptides had specificity profiles not previously observed. We also screened the full-length parent proteins of a subset of array-tested peptides for binding to Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. Finally, we used the peptide binding data, in conjunction with previously reported interactions, to assess the affinity and specificity prediction performance of different models.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceGenomicsHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Reproducibility of ResultsSequence AlignmentPeptidesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2

Identifiers

PMID24967846
PMCPMC4072508
OpenAlexW1994891218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.