Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967588›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Expression of RUNX1 correlates with poor patient prognosis in triple negative breast cancer.

Nicola Ferrari, Zahra M A Mohammed, Colin Nixon, Susan M Mason, Elizabeth Mallon, Donald C McMillan, Joanna S Morris, Ewan R Cameron, Joanne Edwards, Karen Blyth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Regulation of cancer stem cells in triple negative breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola FerrariTransgenic Models Lab, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Zahra M A MohammedAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Colin NixonTransgenic Models Lab, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Susan M MasonTransgenic Models Lab, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth MallonUniversity Pathology Unit, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Donald C McMillanAcademic Unit of Surgery, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Joanna S MorrisSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ewan R CameronSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Joanne EdwardsInstitute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Karen BlythTransgenic Models Lab, Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
University of Glasgow · GBCancer Research UK Scotland Institute · GBSouthern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RUNX1 transcription factor is widely recognised for its tumour suppressor effects in leukaemia. Recently a putative link to breast cancer has started to emerge, however the function of RUNX1 in breast cancer is still unknown. To investigate if RUNX1 expression was important to clinical outcome in primary breast tumours a tissue microarray (TMA) containing biopsies from 483 patients with primary operable invasive ductal breast cancer was stained by immunohistochemistry. RUNX1 was associated with progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumours (P<0.05), more tumour CD4+(P<0.05) and CD8+(P<0.01) T-lymphocytic infiltrate, increased tumour CD138+plasma cell (P<0.01) and more CD68+macrophage infiltrate (P<0.001). RUNX1 expression did not influence outcome of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive or HER2-positive disease, however on univariate analysis a high RUNX1 protein was significantly associated with poorer cancer-specific survival in patients with ER-negative (P<0.05) and with triple negative (TN) invasive breast cancer (P<0.05). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis of cancer-specific survival showed a trend towards significance in ER-negative patients (P<0.1) and was significant in triple negative patients (P<0.05). Of relevance, triple negative breast cancer currently lacks good biomarkers and patients with this subtype do not benefit from the option of targeted therapy unlike patients with ER-positive or HER2-positive disease. Using multivariate analysis RUNX1 was identified as an independent prognostic marker in the triple negative subgroup. Overall, our study identifies RUNX1 as a new prognostic indicator correlating with poor prognosis specifically in the triple negative subtype of human breast cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell Line, TumorCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID24967588
PMCPMC4072705
OpenAlexW2008102732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.