Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967415›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Modelling arterial pressure waveforms using Gaussian functions and two-stage particle swarm optimizer.

Chengyu Liu, Tao Zhuang, Lina Zhao, Faliang Chang, Changchun Liu, Shoushui Wei, Qiqiang Li, Dingchang Zheng

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chengyu LiuSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China ; School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China ; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4515-5773
Tao ZhuangNational Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Lina ZhaoSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Faliang ChangSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Changchun LiuSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Shoushui WeiSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Qiqiang LiSchool of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China.
Dingchang ZhengInstitute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-4548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes of arterial pressure waveform characteristics have been accepted as risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases. Waveform modelling using Gaussian functions has been used to decompose arterial pressure pulses into different numbers of subwaves and hence quantify waveform characteristics. However, the fitting accuracy and computation efficiency of current modelling approaches need to be improved. This study aimed to develop a novel two-stage particle swarm optimizer (TSPSO) to determine optimal parameters of Gaussian functions. The evaluation was performed on carotid and radial artery pressure waveforms (CAPW and RAPW) which were simultaneously recorded from twenty normal volunteers. The fitting accuracy and calculation efficiency of our TSPSO were compared with three published optimization methods: the Nelder-Mead, the modified PSO (MPSO), and the dynamic multiswarm particle swarm optimizer (DMS-PSO). The results showed that TSPSO achieved the best fitting accuracy with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.1% for CAPW and 1.0% for RAPW, in comparison with 4.2% and 4.1% for Nelder-Mead, 2.0% and 1.9% for MPSO, and 1.2% and 1.1% for DMS-PSO. In addition, to achieve target MAE of 2.0%, the computation time of TSPSO was only 1.5 s, which was only 20% and 30% of that for MPSO and DMS-PSO, respectively.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAdultArterial PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID24967415
PMCPMC4054788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.