Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967349›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Development and validation of the Tibetan primary care assessment tool.

Wenhua Wang, Leiyu Shi, Aitian Yin, Youwen Lai, Elizabeth Maitland, Stephen Nicholas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenhua WangCenter for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxilu, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-728X
Leiyu ShiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins Primary Care Policy Center, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-0849
Aitian YinCenter for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxilu, Jinan, Shandong 250012, China.
Youwen LaiTibet Health Capacity Building Program, No. 2 Norbulinka South Road, Lhasa, Tibet 850000, China.
Elizabeth MaitlandSchool of Management, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1551-4787
Stephen NicholasGuangdong Research Institute for International Strategies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, No. 2 Baiyun Dadao Bei, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510420, China ; Tianjin Normal University, 57-1 Wujiayao Road, Hexi District, Tianjin 300074, China ; Faculty of Business and Law, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-7105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a primary care assessment tool in Tibetan area and assess the primary care quality among different healthcare settings.

methodsPrimary care assessment tool-Tibetan version (PCAT-T) was developed to measure seven primary care domains. Data from a cross-sectional survey of 1386 patients was used to conduct validity and reliability analysis of PCAT-T. Analysis of variance was used to conduct comparison of primary care quality among different healthcare settings.

resultsA 28-item PCAT-T was constructed which included seven multi-item scales and two single-item scales. All of multi-item scales achieved good internal consistency and item-total correlations. Scaling assumptions tests were well satisfied. The full range of possible scores was observed for all scales, except first contact and continuity. Compared with prefecture hospital (77.42) and county hospital (82.01), township health center achieved highest primary care quality total score (86.64).

conclusionsPCAT-T is a valid and reliable tool to measure patients' experience of primary care in the Tibet Autonomous Region. Township health center has the best primary care performance compared with other healthcare settings, and township health center should play a key role in providing primary care in Tibet.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareTibet

Identifiers

PMID24967349
PMCPMC4055487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.