Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967225›Full record

ReviewISRN nephrology2013

New biomarkers for the quick detection of acute kidney injury.

Abdulmuttalip Simsek, Volkan Tugcu, Ali Ihsan Tasci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ISRN nephrology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Macrophage angiotensin ATAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Lipopolysaccharide fromArchives of Razi Institute · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Potential Biomarkers in Diagnosis of Renal Acanthamoebiasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdulmuttalip SimsekDepartment of Urology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street No. 11, Zuhuratbaba, 3400 Istanbul, Turkey.
Volkan TugcuDepartment of Urology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street No. 11, Zuhuratbaba, 3400 Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Ihsan TasciDepartment of Urology, Bakırkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street No. 11, Zuhuratbaba, 3400 Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and strong problem in the diagnosis of which based on measurement of BUN and serum creatinine. These traditional methods are not sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of AKI. AKI is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients and a quick detection is impossible with BUN and serum creatinine. A number of serum and urinary proteins have been identified that may messenger AKI prior to a rise in BUN and serum creatinine. New biomarkers of AKI, including NGAL, KIM-1, cystatin-C, IL-18, and L-FABP, are more favourable tests than creatinine which have been identified and studied in several experimental and clinical training. This paper will discuss some of these new biomarkers and their potential as useful signs of AKI. We searched the literature using PubMed and MEDLINE with acute kidney injury, urine, and serum new biomarkers and the articles were selected only from publication types in English.

Identifiers

PMID24967225
PMCPMC4045421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.