Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24967116›Full record

ArticleISRN orthopedics2013

TEFTOM: A Promising General Trauma Expectation/Outcome Measure-Results of a Validation Study on Pan-American Ankle and Distal Tibia Trauma Patients.

Michael Suk, Monica Daigl, Richard E Buckley, Cleber A J Paccola, Dean G Lorich, David L Helfet, Beate Hanson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISRN orthopedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Determinants of functional outcome following ankle fracture.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael SukOrthopaedic Trauma Service, College of Medicine Jacksonville, University of Florida, 655 West Eight St, 2nd Floor ACC, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
Monica DaiglClinical Investigation and Documentation, AO Foundation, Stettbachstrasse 6, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-8288
Richard E BuckleyDepartment of Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, AC 144A, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2T9.
Cleber A J PaccolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Ribeirão Preto School of Medicine, São Paulo University, São Paolo, Brazil.
Dean G LorichOrthopaedic Trauma Service, New York Presbyterian University Hospital of Columbia and Cornell, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065-4870, USA.
David L HelfetOrthopaedic Trauma Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021-4898, USA.
Beate HansonClinical Investigation and Documentation, AO Foundation, Stettbachstrasse 6, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland.
AO Foundation · CHCornell University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. In orthopedics, there is no instrument specifically designed to assess patients' expectations of their final surgery outcome in general trauma populations. We developed the Trauma Expectation Factor Trauma Outcome Measure (TEFTOM) to investigate the fulfilment of patients' expectations one year after surgery as a measure of general trauma surgical outcomes. The aim of this paper was to assess the psychometric characteristics of this new general trauma outcome measure. Methods. The questionnaire was tested in 201 ankle and distal tibia fracture patients scheduled for surgery. Patients were followed up for twelve months. The TEFTOM questionnaire was evaluated for its criterion validity, internal consistency, reproducibility, and responsiveness. Results. TOM showed good criterion validity against the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Scale (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.69-0.77). Internal consistency was acceptable for TEF (Cronbach's alpha = 0.65-0.76) and excellent for TOM (Cronbach's alpha = 0.76-0.85). Reproducibility was moderate to very good (intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) ≥0.67) for TEF and very good (ICC ≥0.92) for TOM. TOM also proved to be responsive to changes in patients' condition over time (Wald test; P < 0.001). Conclusions. TEFTOM is a promising tool for measuring general trauma outcomes in terms of patients' expectation fulfilment that proved to be valid, internally consistent, reproducible, and responsive to change.

Identifiers

PMID24967116
PMCPMC4045348
OpenAlexW2032252731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.