Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24966939›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Prognostic value of Ki67 index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Wen-Yi Zhao, Jia Xu, Ming Wang, Zi-Zhen Zhang, Lin Tu, Chao-Jie Wang, Tian-Long Lin, Yan-Yin Shen, Qiang Liu, Hui Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. GIST: Correlation of risk classifications and outcome.Journal of medicine and life · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Value ofJournal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wen-Yi ZhaoDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Jia XuDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Ming WangDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Zi-Zhen ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Lin TuDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Chao-Jie WangDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Tian-Long LinDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Yan-Yin ShenDepartment of Pathology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Pathology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.
Hui CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKi67 index is one of the most important immunocytochemical markers of proliferation in tumors, but the criterion of Ki67 index in GISTs was not well-defined yet. Our study aims to fully evaluate the prognostic value of Ki67 index in GIST patients and efficiency of imatinib adjuvant therapy.

methodsClinicopathological data were confirmed by pathological diagnosis and clinical recorders. Recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were evaluated in 418 GIST patients (370 cases only taken the surgery and 48 high-risks taken imatinib adjuvant therapy after R0 resection).

resultsTwo cutoff levels of Ki67 index (>5 and >8%) were established in our study through statistical analysis. Ki67 index (≤5, 6-8 and >8%) is an independent prognostic factor for RFS of GIST patients. Ki67 index>8% can precisely sub-divide high-risk GISTs effectively with different outcomes, and high-risk patients with Ki67 index>8% showed a poorer prognosis even with imatinib adjuvant therapy.

conclusionKi67 index is an effective complementation of modified NIH criteria in predicting the prognosis of GISTs, and Ki67 index>8% may act as an unfavorable factor for imatinib adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesBiopsyChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedMitotic IndexPiperazinesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesImatinib MesylateKi-67 AntigenPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesGastrointestinal stromal tumorKi67prognosistargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID24966939
PMCPMC4069950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.