Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24966878›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2014

Keel petal incision: a simple and efficient method for genetic crossing in Medicago truncatula.

Vijaykumar Veerappan, Khem Kadel, Naudin Alexis, Ashley Scott, Igor Kryvoruchko, Senjuti Sinharoy, Mark Taylor, Michael Udvardi, Rebecca Dickstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Role of theHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  2. Mutation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vijaykumar VeerappanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, Texas 76203, USA.
Khem KadelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, Texas 76203, USA.
Naudin AlexisDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, Texas 76203, USA.
Ashley ScottDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, Texas 76203, USA.
Igor KryvoruchkoPlant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.
Senjuti SinharoyPlant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.
Mark TaylorPlant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.
Michael UdvardiPlant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA.
Rebecca DicksteinDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #305220, Denton, Texas 76203, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic crossing is an essential tool in both forward and reverse genetic approaches to understand the biological functions of genes. For Medicago truncatula (barrel medic) various crossing techniques have been used which differ in the methods used to dissect the female parent's unopened flower bud to remove immature anthers for prevention of self-pollination. Previously described methods including front, side or back incision methods may damage the flower bud, impeding successful fertilization and/or seed development because they may allow pollen to dislodge and floral organs to desiccate after crossing, all of which diminish the success rates of crossing.

resultsWe report the keel petal incision method for genetic crossing in M. truncatula ecotype R108 and demonstrate successful crosses with two other M. truncatula ecotypes, A17 and A20. In the method presented here, an incision is made along the central line of the keel petal from the bottom 1/3rd of the female parent's flower bud to its distal end. This allows easy removal of anthers from the flower bud and access for cross-pollination. After pollination, the stigma and the deposited pollen from the male donor are covered by the keel petal, wing petals and standard petal, forming a natural pouch. The pouch prevents dislodging of deposited pollen from the stigma and protects the internal floral organs from drying out, without using cling-film or water-containing chambers to maintain a humid environment. The keel petal incision method showed an approximate 80% success rate in the M. truncatula R108 ecotype and also in other ecotypes including Jemalong A17 and A20.

conclusionsOur keel petal incision protocol shows marked improvement over existing methods with respect to the ease of crossing and the percentage of successful crosses. Developed for the M. truncatula R108 ecotype, the protocol has been demonstrated with A17 and A20 ecotypes and is expected to work with other ecotypes. Investigators of varying experience have achieved genetic crosses in M. truncatula using this method.

Indexed as

Artificial hybridizationBarrel medicGenetic crossingKeel petalLegumeMedicago truncatula

Identifiers

PMID24966878
PMCPMC4070640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.