ArticleFrontiers in immunology2014
Leishmania donovani Nucleoside Hydrolase Terminal Domains in Cross-Protective Immunotherapy Against Leishmania amazonensis Murine Infection.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic potential of GLP recombinant antigens in whole blood assays for Leishmania infantum infection.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Design and development of highly conserved, HLA-promiscuous T cell multiepitope vaccines against human visceral leishmaniasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Immunotherapeutic Strategies as Potential Treatment Options for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Single-cell ATAC sequencing identifies sleepy macrophages during reciprocity of cytokines inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Inoculation of theMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Assessment of the Antileishmanial Potential ofACS omega · 2021Article
- Multifunctional, TNF-α and IFN-γ-Secreting CD4 and CD8 T Cells and CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Design of multi-epitope peptides containing HLA class-I and class-II-restricted epitopes derived from immunogenic Leishmania proteins, and evaluation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses induced in cured cutaneous leishmaniasis subjects.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Protective or Detrimental? Understanding the Role of Host Immunity in Leishmaniasis.Microorganisms · 2019Review
- The F1F3 Recombinant Chimera ofFrontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- Nucleoside Hydrolase NH 36: A Vital Enzyme for theFrontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- Enzymatic Transition States and Drug Design.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Article
- Identification of BALB/c Immune Markers Correlated with a Partial Protection to Leishmania infantum after Vaccination with a Rationally Designed Multi-epitope Cysteine Protease A Peptide-Based Nanovaccine.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2017Article
- A Chimera Containing CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Epitopes of theFrontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Vaccination with poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles loaded with solubleInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
- F1 Domain of theFrontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Vaccination: A Matter of Quality.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
- Targeted Immunology for Prevention and Cure of VL.Frontiers in immunology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleoside hydrolases of the Leishmania genus are vital enzymes for the replication of the DNA and conserved phylogenetic markers of the parasites. Leishmania donovani nucleoside hydrolase (NH36) induced a main CD4(+) T cell driven protective response against L. chagasi infection in mice which is directed against its C-terminal domain. In this study, we used the three recombinant domains of NH36: N-terminal domain (F1, amino acids 1-103), central domain (F2 aminoacids 104-198), and C-terminal domain (F3 amino acids 199-314) in combination with saponin and assayed their immunotherapeutic effect on Balb/c mice previously infected with L. amazonensis. We identified that the F1 and F3 peptides determined strong cross-immunotherapeutic effects, reducing the size of footpad lesions to 48 and 64%, and the parasite load in footpads to 82.6 and 81%, respectively. The F3 peptide induced the strongest anti-NH36 antibody response and intradermal response (IDR) against L. amazonenis and a high secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α with reduced levels of IL-10. The F1 vaccine, induced similar increases of IgG2b antibodies and IFN-γ and TNF-α levels, but no IDR and no reduction of IL-10. The multiparameter flow cytometry analysis was used to assess the immune response after immunotherapy and disclosed that the degree of the immunotherapeutic effect is predicted by the frequencies of the CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells producing IL-2 or TNF-α or both. Total frequencies and frequencies of double-cytokine CD4 T cell producers were enhanced by F1 and F3 vaccines. Collectively, our multifunctional analysis disclosed that immunotherapeutic protection improved as the CD4 responses progressed from 1+ to 2+, in the case of the F1 and F3 vaccines, and as the CD8 responses changed qualitatively from 1+ to 3+, mainly in the case of the F1 vaccine, providing new correlates of immunotherapeutic protection against cutaneous leishmaniasis in mice based on T-helper TH1 and CD8(+) mediated immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.