Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24966232›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014

Logic programming to predict cell fate patterns and retrodict genotypes in organogenesis.

Benjamin A Hall, Ethan Jackson, Alex Hajnal, Jasmin Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin A HallMicrosoft Research, 21 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK benhall@microsoft.com.
Ethan JacksonMicrosoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052, USA.
Alex HajnalInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland.
Jasmin FisherMicrosoft Research, 21 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QW, UK jasmin.fisher@microsoft.com.
Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) · GBMicrosoft (United States) · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development is a paradigm system for understanding cell differentiation in the process of organogenesis. Through temporal and spatial controls, the fate pattern of six cells is determined by the competition of the LET-23 and the Notch signalling pathways. Modelling cell fate determination in vulval development using state-based models, coupled with formal analysis techniques, has been established as a powerful approach in predicting the outcome of combinations of mutations. However, computing the outcomes of complex and highly concurrent models can become prohibitive. Here, we show how logic programs derived from state machines describing the differentiation of C. elegans vulval precursor cells can increase the speed of prediction by four orders of magnitude relative to previous approaches. Moreover, this increase in speed allows us to infer, or 'retrodict', compatible genomes from cell fate patterns. We exploit this technique to predict highly variable cell fate patterns resulting from dig-1 reduced-function mutations and let-23 mosaics. In addition to the new insights offered, we propose our technique as a platform for aiding the design and analysis of experimental data.

Indexed as

GenotypeOrganogenesisAlgorithmsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsCell LineageErbB ReceptorsFemaleGenome, HelminthModels, GeneticMutationReceptors, NotchSignal TransductionTime FactorsVulvaCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsErbB Receptorslet-23 protein, C elegansReceptors, NotchC. elegansdevelopmentexecutable modellinglogic programmingorganogenesis

Identifiers

PMID24966232
PMCPMC4233684
OpenAlexW2050109691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.