Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24966225›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Weak negative and positive selection and the drift load at splice sites.

Stepan V Denisov, Georgii A Bazykin, Roman Sutormin, Alexander V Favorov, Andrey A Mironov, Mikhail S Gelfand, Alexey S Kondrashov

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is there any intron sliding in mammals?BMC evolutionary biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stepan V DenisovA.A. Kharkevich Insitute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Georgii A BazykinA.A. Kharkevich Insitute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow, RussiaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Roman SutorminFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander V FavorovDivision of Oncology Biostatistics, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MDLaboratory of System Biology and Computational Genetics, Department of Computational System Biology, N.I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, RussiaLaboratory of Bioinformatics, State Research Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganism (GosNIIGenetika), Moscow, Russia.
Andrey A MironovA.A. Kharkevich Insitute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow, RussiaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandA.A. Kharkevich Insitute for Information Transmission Problems RAS, Moscow, RussiaFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia gelfand@iitp.ru.
Alexey S KondrashovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, RussiaLife Sciences Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUInstitute for Information Transmission Problems · RUSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Splice sites (SSs) are short sequences that are crucial for proper mRNA splicing in eukaryotic cells, and therefore can be expected to be shaped by strong selection. Nevertheless, in mammals and in other intron-rich organisms, many of the SSs often involve nonconsensus (Nc), rather than consensus (Cn), nucleotides, and beyond the two critical nucleotides, the SSs are not perfectly conserved between species. Here, we compare the SS sequences between primates, and between Drosophila fruit flies, to reveal the pattern of selection acting at SSs. Cn-to-Nc substitutions are less frequent, and Nc-to-Cn substitutions are more frequent, than neutrally expected, indicating, respectively, negative and positive selection. This selection is relatively weak (1 < |4Nes| < 4), and has a similar efficiency in primates and in Drosophila. Within some nucleotide positions, the positive selection in favor of Nc-to-Cn substitutions is weaker than the negative selection maintaining already established Cn nucleotides; this difference is due to site-specific negative selection favoring current Nc nucleotides. In general, however, the strength of negative selection protecting the Cn alleles is similar in magnitude to the strength of positive selection favoring replacement of Nc alleles, as expected under the simple nearly neutral turnover. In summary, although a fraction of the Nc nucleotides within SSs is maintained by selection, the abundance of deleterious nucleotides in this class suggests a substantial genome-wide drift load.

Indexed as

RNA Splice SitesSelection, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophilaGenetic DriftHumansPrimatesRNA SplicingRNA Splice Sitesdrift loadnearly neutral evolutionnegative selectionpositive selectionsplice sitessplicing

Identifiers

PMID24966225
PMCPMC4079205
OpenAlexW2138829848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.