ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2014
ROSE-AHF and lessons learned.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute kidney injury in acute heart failure-when to worry and when not to worry?Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024Review
- Differential effects of inotropes and inodilators on renal function in acute cardiac care.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Article
- Natriuretic Response Is Highly Variable and Associated With 6-Month Survival: Insights From the ROSE-AHF Trial.JACC. Heart failure · 2019Article
- The dark side of the kidney in cardio-renal syndrome: renal venous hypertension and congestive kidney failure.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nesiritide and dopamine have been recognized for some time as potential renal adjunct therapies in the management of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Several studies have yielded conflicting evidence of the efficacy of both medications in enhancing the renal function of patients with AHF. The Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation (ROSE) study was a multicenter double-blind placebo controlled trial designed to assess the potential renoprotective effects of low-dose nesiritide and dopamine in AHF patients with renal dysfunction. This article will focus on previous research, summary of results, and lessons learned from the ROSE-AHF trial as well as future directions for clinical research and applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.