Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24965935›Full record

Observational studyBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Solid oral forms availability in children: a cost saving investigation.

Audrey Lajoinie, Emilie Henin, Behrouz Kassai, David Terry

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characterization and Bioavailability of Wogonin by Different Administration Routes in Beagles.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Audrey LajoinieEPICIME-CIC 1407 Inserm, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon Lyon, F-69677, Bron, France; Université Lyon 1, UMR 5558 CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, F-69622, Villeurbanne, France.
Emilie Henin
Behrouz Kassai
David Terry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the suitability and potential cost savings, from both the hospital and community perspective, of prescribed oral liquid medicine substitution with acceptable solid forms for children over 2 years.

methodOral liquid medicines dispensed from a paediatric hospital (UK) in 1 week were assessed by screening for existence of the solid form alternative and evaluating the acceptability of the available solid form, firstly related to the prescribed dose and secondly to acceptable size depending on the child's age. Costs were calculated based on providing treatment for 28 days or prescribed duration for short term treatments.

resultsOver 90% (440/476) of liquid formulations were available as a marketed solid form. Considering dosage acceptability (maximum of 10% deviation from prescribed dosage or 0% for narrow therapeutic range drugs, maximum tablet divisions into quarters) 80% of liquids could be substituted with a solid form. The main limitation for liquid substitution would be solid form size. However, two-thirds of prescribed liquids could have been substituted with a suitable solid form for dosage and size, with estimated savings being of £5K and £8K in 1 week, respectively based on hospital and community costs, corresponding to a projected annual saving of £238K and £410K (single institution).

conclusionWhilst not all children over 2 years will be able to swallow tablets, drug cost savings if oral liquid formulations were substituted with suitable solid dosage forms would be considerable. Given the numerous advantages of solid forms compared with liquids, this study may provide a theoretical basis for investing in supporting children to swallow tablets/capsules.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceTabletsAdministration, OralAdolescentChemistry, PharmaceuticalChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug CostsHumansPrescription DrugsUnited KingdomPrescription DrugsTabletsdrug formulationoral drug deliverypaediatricswallowing

Identifiers

PMID24965935
PMCPMC4243883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.