Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24965762›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Genomewide comparison and novel ncRNAs of Aquificales.

Marcus Lechner, Astrid I Nickel, Stefanie Wehner, Konstantin Riege, Nicolas Wieseke, Benedikt M Beckmann, Roland K Hartmann, Manja Marz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Heuristic algorithms for best match graph editing.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Minimal and RNA-free RNase P inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Phylogenomics with paralogs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus Lechner
Astrid I Nickel
Stefanie Wehner
Konstantin Riege
Nicolas Wieseke
Benedikt M Beckmann
Roland K HartmannInstitut für Pharmazeutische Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marbacher Weg 6, 35032 Marburg, Germany. roland.hartmann@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Manja Marz
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Aquificales are a diverse group of thermophilic bacteria that thrive in terrestrial and marine hydrothermal environments. They can be divided into the families Aquificaceae, Desulfurobacteriaceae and Hydrogenothermaceae. Although eleven fully sequenced and assembled genomes are available, only little is known about this taxonomic order in terms of RNA metabolism.

resultsIn this work, we compare the available genomes, extend their protein annotation, identify regulatory sequences, annotate non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) of known function, predict novel ncRNA candidates, show idiosyncrasies of the genetic decoding machinery, present two different types of transfer-messenger RNAs and variations of the CRISPR systems. Furthermore, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the Aquificales based on entire genome sequences, and extended this by a classification among all bacteria using 16S rRNA sequences and a set of orthologous proteins.Combining several in silico features (e.g. conserved and stable secondary structures, GC-content, comparison based on multiple genome alignments) with an in vivo dRNA-seq transcriptome analysis of Aquifex aeolicus, we predict roughly 100 novel ncRNA candidates in this bacterium.

conclusionsWe have here re-analyzed the Aquificales, a group of bacteria thriving in extreme environments, sharing the feature of a small, compact genome with a reduced number of protein and ncRNA genes. We present several classical ncRNAs and riboswitch candidates. By combining in silico analysis with dRNA-seq data of A. aeolicus we predict nearly 100 novel ncRNA candidates.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialBase SequenceClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsDatabases, GeneticDigoxigeninGram-Positive BacteriaNucleic Acid ConformationOligonucleotidesPhylogenyRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, TransferRNA, UntranslatedSequence Analysis, RNA6S RNADigoxigeninlocked nucleic acidOligonucleotidesRibonuclease PRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, TransferRNA, UntranslatedtmRNA

Identifiers

PMID24965762
PMCPMC4227106
OpenAlexW2020968948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.