ArticleInfection2014
Clinical course and quality of care in ART-naïve patients newly presenting in a HIV outpatient clinic.
Article in Infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV and Drug-Resistant Subtypes.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effects of client-centered Representative Payee Services on antiretroviral therapy adherence among marginalized people living with HIV.BMC public health · 2020Article
- A Simple Symptom Score for Acute Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in a San Diego Community-Based Screening Program.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018Article
- People living with undiagnosed HIV infection and a low CD4 count: estimates from surveillance data, Italy, 2012 to 2014.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018Article
- Reasons for not starting antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected individuals: a changing landscape.Infection · 2016Article
- Article
- The Cologne-Bonn cohort: lessons learned.Infection · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLittle data exist about the quality of care for HIV-infected subjects in Germany. We investigated the clinical course of HIV-infected subjects newly presenting in our HIV outpatient clinic.
methodsAntiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve HIV-infected subjects presenting between 2007 and 2008 were followed until June 2012. Clinical data and laboratory parameters were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively.
resultsFrom 281 subjects included, 34 patients (12%) were lost to follow-up. 247 subjects remained, and 171 patients were followed for 1,497 days [1,121/1,726] (all data: median [interquartile range]). ART was started in 199 patients (81%) 182 days [44/849] after HIV diagnosis, and all patients were treated according to European guidelines or within clinical trials. The CD4 cell count at first presentation was 320/µL [160/500] and declined to 210/µL [100/300] at ART start. 12 months thereafter, the CD4 cell count increased to 410/µL [230/545]. The HIV RNA was suppressed below 50 copies/mL after 108 days [63/173] in 182 patients (91%). Initial ART was changed in 71 patients (36%) after 281 days [99/718], in five patients (7%) due to virological failure, in 66 patients (93%) due to other reasons, e.g. side effects or patient's request.
conclusionTwo-thirds of the included patients were followed for more than 3 years, and ART was initiated in 81% of the patients leading to complete virological suppression in most patients. Compliance of physicians with treatment guidelines was high. Late presentation with a severely compromised immune function remains a problem and impairs the otherwise good prognosis of HIV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24965613What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.