ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2014
Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion in cancer patients: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrostomy Tube Insertion Complications and Patient Care Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Cureus · 2021Article
- Severe hemorrhagic gastritis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimDysphagia, with associated malnutrition is a common feature in up to 64 % of patients with cancers of the head and neck region, the oesophagus and the gastro-oesophageal junction (Donaldson and Lenon Cancer 43(Suppl 5):2036-52, 1979). These patients usually require alternate routes of feeding during treatment. However, these methods of feeding are not without associated complications. This study was carried out to assess the complications associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion, the commonest means of providing nutrition in this patient group.
methodsTwo hundred and sixty patients with successful percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion were retrospectively reviewed to assess the complications of the procedure.
resultsThe overall complication rate was 25 % (65 patients). Fifty-five patients (21 %) patients had minor complications. Ten patients (3.8 %) suffered a major complication, including peritonitis and major peri-PEG infection each in three patients (1.2 %), while oesophageal perforation, collection around the PEG insertion site requiring operative drainage, bleeding from the PEG insertion site and tumour seeding at the gastrostomy site were each seen in one (0.4 %) patient.
conclusionPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion is a useful means of providing enteral nutrition to patients with swallowing problems. Patients with head and neck cancer who are likely to develop dysphagia should be assessed promptly for PEG tube insertion before the start of radiation. Early recognition and prompt treatment of serious complications can avoid potential fatality associated with PEG tubes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.