ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Steady state analysis of Boolean molecular network models via model reduction and computational algebra.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Algebraic Approach to Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.Psychometrika · 2025Article
- Phenotype Control techniques for Boolean gene regulatory networks.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Review
- Phenotype control techniques for Boolean gene regulatory networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Fine tuning a logical model of cancer cells to predict drug synergies: combining manual curation and automated parameterization.Frontiers in systems biology · 2023Article
- Boolean modelling as a logic-based dynamic approach in systems medicine.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Attractor detection and enumeration algorithms for Boolean networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- A Middle-Out Modeling Strategy to Extend a Colon Cancer Logical Model Improves Drug Synergy Predictions in Epithelial-Derived Cancer Cell Lines.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- The Dynamics of Canalizing Boolean Networks.Complexity · 2020Article
- Control of Intracellular Molecular Networks Using Algebraic Methods.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- Simulating heterogeneous populations using Boolean models.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Analysis Tools for Interconnected Boolean Networks With Biological Applications.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Automatic Screening for Perturbations in Boolean Networks.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- The CoLoMoTo Interactive Notebook: Accessible and Reproducible Computational Analyses for Qualitative Biological Networks.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- A network modeling approach to elucidate drug resistance mechanisms and predict combinatorial drug treatments in breast cancer.Cancer convergence · 2017Article
- An efficient algorithm for identifying primary phenotype attractors of a large-scale Boolean network.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Identification of control targets in Boolean molecular network models via computational algebra.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Analysis of a dynamic model of guard cell signaling reveals the stability of signal propagation.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Estimating Propensity Parameters Using Google PageRank and Genetic Algorithms.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- A Qualitative Model of the Differentiation Network in Chondrocyte Maturation: A Holistic View of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy.PloS one · 2016Article
- An Efficient Steady-State Analysis Method for Large Boolean Networks with High Maximum Node Connectivity.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA key problem in the analysis of mathematical models of molecular networks is the determination of their steady states. The present paper addresses this problem for Boolean network models, an increasingly popular modeling paradigm for networks lacking detailed kinetic information. For small models, the problem can be solved by exhaustive enumeration of all state transitions. But for larger models this is not feasible, since the size of the phase space grows exponentially with the dimension of the network. The dimension of published models is growing to over 100, so that efficient methods for steady state determination are essential. Several methods have been proposed for large networks, some of them heuristic. While these methods represent a substantial improvement in scalability over exhaustive enumeration, the problem for large networks is still unsolved in general.
resultsThis paper presents an algorithm that consists of two main parts. The first is a graph theoretic reduction of the wiring diagram of the network, while preserving all information about steady states. The second part formulates the determination of all steady states of a Boolean network as a problem of finding all solutions to a system of polynomial equations over the finite number system with two elements. This problem can be solved with existing computer algebra software. This algorithm compares favorably with several existing algorithms for steady state determination. One advantage is that it is not heuristic or reliant on sampling, but rather determines algorithmically and exactly all steady states of a Boolean network. The code for the algorithm, as well as the test suite of benchmark networks, is available upon request from the corresponding author.
conclusionsThe algorithm presented in this paper reliably determines all steady states of sparse Boolean networks with up to 1000 nodes. The algorithm is effective at analyzing virtually all published models even those of moderate connectivity. The problem for large Boolean networks with high average connectivity remains an open problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.