Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24965132›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2014

Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

FAITH Investigators

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00761813 nacompletednot on this map

Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures: A Multi-Centre Randomized Trial Comparing Sliding Hip Screws and Cancellous Screws on Revision Surgery Rates and Quality of Life in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2009 to 2016Enrolled1,108ConditionsFemoral Neck FracturesArmsOpen reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with single sliding hip screw, ORIF with multiple cancellous screws
NCT04770233 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Improving the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Norway With Register-RCTs - Who Should Have Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2021 to 2045Enrolled328ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesArmsEarly ACL reconstruction, Active rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Can a Computer-based Force Feedback Hip Fracture Skills Simulator Improve Clinical Task Performance? A Cadaveric Validation Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

FAITH Investigators
McMaster University · CA

Funding

Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures: A Multi-cR01AR055267 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SWIONTKOWSKI, MARC F. · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip fractures are a common type of fragility fracture that afflict 293,000 Americans (over 5,000 per week) and 35,000 Canadians (over 670 per week) annually. Despite the large population impact the optimal fixation technique for low energy femoral neck fractures remains controversial. The primary objective of the FAITH study is to assess the impact of cancellous screw fixation versus sliding hip screws on rates of revision surgery at 24 months in individuals with femoral neck fractures. The secondary objective is to determine the impact on health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, health state utilities, fracture healing, mortality and fracture-related adverse events. METHODS/

designFAITH is a multi-centre, multi-national randomized controlled trial utilizing minimization to determine patient allocation. Surgeons in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia will recruit a total of at least 1,000 patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures. Using central randomization, patients will be allocated to receive surgical treatment with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw. Patient outcomes will be assessed at one week (baseline), 10 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post initial fixation. We will independently adjudicate revision surgery and complications within 24 months of the initial fixation. Outcome analysis will be performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and likelihood ratio test. DISCUSSION: This study represents major international efforts to definitively resolve the treatment of low-energy femoral neck fractures. This trial will not only change current Orthopaedic practice, but will also set a benchmark for the conduct of future Orthopaedic trials.

trial registrationThe FAITH trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT00761813).

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsQuality of LifeResearch DesignAsiaAustraliaClinical ProtocolsEuropeFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLikelihood FunctionsNorth AmericaPostoperative ComplicationsProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignReoperation

Identifiers

PMID24965132
PMCPMC4230242
OpenAlexW2182824065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.