Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24965054›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Ycasd - a tool for capturing and scaling data from graphical representations.

Arnd Gross, Sibylle Schirm, Markus Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Model-based optimization of G-CSF treatment during cytotoxic chemotherapy.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arnd GrossInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Haertelstrasse 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany. arnd.gross@imise.uni-leipzig.de.
Sibylle Schirm
Markus Scholz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMathematical modelling of biological processes often requires a large variety of different data sets for parameter estimation and validation. It is common practice that clinical data are not available in raw formats but are provided as graphical representations. Hence, in order to include these data into environments used for model simulations and statistical analyses, it is necessary to extract them from their presentations in the literature. For this purpose, we developed the freely available open source tool ycasd. After establishing a coordinate system by simple axes definitions, it supports convenient retrieval of data points from arbitrary figures.

resultsAfter describing the general functionality and providing an overview of the programme interface, we demonstrate on an example how to use ycasd. A major advantage of ycasd is that it does not require a certain input file format to open and process figures. All options of ycasd are accessible through a single window which eases handling and speeds up data extraction. For subsequent processing of extracted data points, results can be formatted as a Matlab or an R matrix. We extensively compare the functionality and other features of ycasd with other publically available tools. Finally, we provide a short summary of our experiences with ycasd in the context of modelling.

conclusionsWe conclude that our tool is suitable for convenient and accurate data retrievals from graphical representations such as papers. Comparison of tools reveals that ycasd is a good compromise between easy and quick capturing of scientific data from publications and complexity. Our tool is routinely applied in the context of biological modelling, where numerous time series data are required to develop models. The software can also be useful for other kinds of analyses for which published data are required but are not available in raw formats such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsSoftwareComputational BiologyHumansModels, BiologicalStatistics as TopicUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID24965054
PMCPMC4085079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.