Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24963838›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2014

Envelope responses in single-trial EEG indicate attended speaker in a 'cocktail party'.

Cort Horton, Ramesh Srinivasan, Michael D'Zmura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Attentional Engagement with Target and Distractor Streams Predicts Speech Comprehension in Multitalker Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reliability of Neural Entrainment in the Human Auditory System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Neural Markers of Speech Comprehension: Measuring EEG Tracking of Linguistic Speech Representations, Controlling the Speech Acoustics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cort HortonDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Ramesh Srinivasan
Michael D'Zmura

Funding

Dynamic Neuroimaging with High-Resolution SSVEPsR01MH068004 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SRINIVASAN, RAMESH · 2004 to 2012
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS 2R01-MH68004NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent studies have shown that auditory cortex better encodes the envelope of attended speech than that of unattended speech during multi-speaker ('cocktail party') situations. We investigated whether these differences were sufficiently robust within single-trial electroencephalographic (EEG) data to accurately determine where subjects attended. Additionally, we compared this measure to other established EEG markers of attention. APPROACH: High-resolution EEG was recorded while subjects engaged in a two-speaker 'cocktail party' task. Cortical responses to speech envelopes were extracted by cross-correlating the envelopes with each EEG channel. We also measured steady-state responses (elicited via high-frequency amplitude modulation of the speech) and alpha-band power, both of which have been sensitive to attention in previous studies. Using linear classifiers, we then examined how well each of these features could be used to predict the subjects' side of attention at various epoch lengths. MAIN

resultsWe found that the attended speaker could be determined reliably from the envelope responses calculated from short periods of EEG, with accuracy improving as a function of sample length. Furthermore, envelope responses were far better indicators of attention than changes in either alpha power or steady-state responses. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that envelope-related signals recorded in EEG data can be used to form robust auditory BCI's that do not require artificial manipulation (e.g., amplitude modulation) of stimuli to function.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAlpha RhythmAttentionAuditory CortexBrain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansIndividualityMaleReproducibility of ResultsSensory GatingSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24963838
PMCPMC4143116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.