Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24963707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

ZENK activation in the nidopallium of black-capped chickadees in response to both conspecific and heterospecific calls.

Marc T Avey, Laurie L Bloomfield, Julie E Elie, Todd M Freeberg, Lauren M Guillette, Marisa Hoeschele, Homan Lee, Michele K Moscicki, Jessica L Owens, Christopher B Sturdy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marc T AveyDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Laurie L BloomfieldDepartment of Psychology, Algoma University, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Julie E ElieDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Todd M FreebergDepartments of Psychology and Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Lauren M GuilletteDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Marisa HoescheleDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Homan LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Michele K MoscickiDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jessica L OwensDepartment of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Christopher B SturdyDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal populations in the songbird nidopallium increase in activity the most to conspecific vocalizations relative to heterospecific songbird vocalizations or artificial stimuli such as tones. Here, we tested whether the difference in neural activity between conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations is due to acoustic differences or to the degree of phylogenetic relatedness of the species producing the vocalizations. To compare differences in neural responses of black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, to playback conditions we used a known marker for neural activity, ZENK, in the caudal medial nidopallium and caudomedial mesopallium. We used the acoustically complex 'dee' notes from chick-a-dee calls, and vocalizations from other heterospecific species similar in duration and spectral features. We tested the vocalizations from three heterospecific species (chestnut-backed chickadees, tufted titmice, and zebra finches), the vocalizations from conspecific individuals (black-capped chickadees), and reversed versions of the latter. There were no significant differences in the amount of expression between any of the groups except in the control condition, which resulted in significantly less neuronal activation. Our results suggest that, in certain cases, neuronal activity is not higher in response to conspecific than in response to heterospecific vocalizations for songbirds, but rather is sensitive to the acoustic features of the signal. Both acoustic features of the calls and the phylogenetic relationship between of the signaler and the receiver interact in the response of the nidopallium.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationNervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimal CommunicationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionEarly Growth Response Protein 1PhylogenySongbirdsSound SpectrographySpecies SpecificityVocalization, AnimalEarly Growth Response Protein 1

Identifiers

PMID24963707
PMCPMC4071011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.