ArticleBiosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science
Willingness of the local health department workforce to respond to infectious disease events: empirical, ethical, and legal considerations.
Article in Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attitudes towards COVID-19 precautionary measures and willingness to work during an outbreak among medical students in Singapore: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Telemedicine to Decrease Personal Protective Equipment Use and Protect Healthcare Workers.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists?Revista clinica espanola · 2020Article
- Healthcare Ethics During a Pandemic.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Must I Respond if My Health is at Risk?The Journal of emergency medicine · 2018Article
- Promoting public health legal preparedness for emergencies: review of current trends and their relevance in light of the Ebola crisis.Global health action · 2015Review
- Applying the Ready, Willing, and Able Framework to Assess Agency Public Health Emergency Preparedness: The CDC Perspective.Health securityArticle
- Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Local Health Department Workers' Participation in Infectious Disease Emergency Responses.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
According to the Institute of Medicine, the local health department workforce is at the hub of the public health emergency preparedness system. A growing body of research has pointed to troubling attitudinal gaps among local health department workers, a vital response cohort, regarding willingness to respond to emergent infectious disease threats, ranging from naturally occurring pandemics to bioterrorism events. A summary of relevant literature on the empirical evidence, ethical norms, and legal standards applicable to the willingness of public health professionals to respond to an infectious disease emergency is presented. Recommendations are proposed for future work to be done to bring the relevant empirical, ethical, and legal considerations together to develop practical guidance for the local response to infectious disease emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.