Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24963346›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2014

Comparison of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance and FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of Hodgkin's lymphoma for staging and treatment response.

Juan Montoro, Daniele Laszlo, Natalia Pin Chuen Zing, Giuseppe Petralia, Giorgio Conte, Marzia Colandrea, Giovanni Martinelli, Lorenzo Preda

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06071195 (All-in-One Prostate Cancer Staging with MRI), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06071195 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

All-in-One Prostate Cancer Staging with MRI

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2021 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsProstate CancerArmsProstate Cancer Patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan MontoroDivision of Clinical Haematology/Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Daniele LaszloDivision of Clinical Haematology/Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Natalia Pin Chuen ZingDivision of Clinical Haematology/Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Giuseppe PetraliaDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Giorgio ConteDepartment of Health Science, University of Milan, Milan 20216, Italy.
Marzia ColandreaDivision of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Giovanni MartinelliDivision of Clinical Haematology/Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.
Lorenzo PredaDivision of Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT), 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and hybrid FDG-PET/CT are the most commonly used diagnostic tools for the initial staging and treatment response assessment of lymphomas [1]. The aim of this report is to compare the correlations between functional imaging markers derived from FDG-PET/CT and whole-body, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in a young patient affected by Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).

Indexed as

Hodgkin’s lymphomaPET/CTwhole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID24963346
PMCPMC4027889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.