Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24963080›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias2015

Cognitive stimulation of executive functions in mild cognitive impairment: specific efficacy and impact in memory.

V Moro, M T Condoleo, V Valbusa, E Broggio, G Moretto, G Gambina

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comprehension of written texts for the assessment of clinical competence and decision making in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V MoroNPSY.Lab-Vr, Department of Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy valentina.moro@univr.it.
M T CondoleoNPSY.Lab-Vr, Department of Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy USO Centro Alzheimer e Disturbi Cognitivi, Neurologia d.O, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
V ValbusaNPSY.Lab-Vr, Department of Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy USO Centro Alzheimer e Disturbi Cognitivi, Neurologia d.O, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
E BroggioNPSY.Lab-Vr, Department of Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy USO Centro Alzheimer e Disturbi Cognitivi, Neurologia d.O, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
G MorettoUSO Centro Alzheimer e Disturbi Cognitivi, Neurologia d.O, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
G GambinaUSO Centro Alzheimer e Disturbi Cognitivi, Neurologia d.O, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions play an important role in the maintenance of autonomy in day-to-day activities. Nevertheless, there is little research into specific cognitive training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). We present the results of a program which aims to teach specific strategies and metacognitive abilities in order for patients to be able to carry out attentional and executive tasks. Two groups (A and B) were compared in a cross-over design. After the first evaluation, Group A (but not B) participated in a six month cognitive stimulation program. After a second assessment, only Group B received treatment and then a final evaluation was carried out on both groups. The results show that: i) both groups improved their performance as an effect of training; ii) improvements generalized to memory and general cognitive tasks; iii) in the interval without training, Group B's performance worsened and iv) Group A partially maintained their results over time.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive DysfunctionCross-Over StudiesDisease ProgressionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemory DisordersTreatment Outcomecognitive stimulationexecutive functionsmental deteriorationmild cognitive impairmentneuropsychological rehabilitationstrategy training

Identifiers

PMID24963080
PMCPMC10852843
OpenAlexW2325656657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.