ArticleBMC genomics2014
Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Immune and Molecular Profiling Identifies Prognostic Subgroups and Therapeutic Targets in Chondrosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- In-house homologous recombination deficiency testing in ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional Italian pilot study.Journal of clinical pathology · 2024Article
- Prevalence of BRCA homopolymeric indels in an ION Torrent-based tumour-to-germline testing workflow in high-grade ovarian carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Laboratory Cross-Comparison and Ring Test Trial for TumorJournal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Management of BRCA Tumour Testing in an Integrated Molecular Tumour Board Multidisciplinary Model.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Rare variants discovery by extensive whole-genome sequencing of the Han Chinese population in Taiwan: Applications to cardiovascular medicine.Journal of advanced research · 2021Article
- Cancer Panel Assay for Precision Oncology Clinic: Results from a 1-Year Study.Translational oncology · 2019Article
- Article
- VARIFI-Web-Based Automatic Variant Identification, Filtering and Annotation of Amplicon Sequencing Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Article
- Next-generation sequencing ofPeerJ · 2019Article
- appreci8: a pipeline for precise variant calling integrating 8 tools.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks.Nature biotechnology · 2018Article
- Validation of the OncomineVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2018Article
- Genomic evidence of speciation reversal in ravens.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Comparison of Ion Personal Genome Machine Platforms for the Detection of Variants inCancer research and treatment · 2018Article
- Development and validation of a variant detection workflow for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and its clinical application based on the Ion Torrent technology.Human genomics · 2017Article
- GATK hard filtering: tunable parameters to improve variant calling for next generation sequencing targeted gene panel data.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Evaluating Variant Calling Tools for Non-Matched Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical diagnostic molecular pathology laboratories for analysis of solid tumours; an expert opinion on behalf of IQN Path ASBL.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2017Review
- GLM-based optimization of NGS data analysis: A case study of Roche 454, Ion Torrent PGM and Illumina NextSeq sequencing data.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Ion Torrent PGM is a popular benchtop sequencer that shows promise in replacing conventional Sanger sequencing as the gold standard for mutation detection. Despite the PGM's reported high accuracy in calling single nucleotide variations, it tends to generate many false positive calls in detecting insertions and deletions (indels), which may hinder its utility for clinical genetic testing.
resultsRecently, the proprietary analytical workflow for the Ion Torrent sequencer, Torrent Suite (TS), underwent a series of upgrades. We evaluated three major upgrades of TS by calling indels in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our analysis revealed that false negative indels could be generated by TS under both default calling parameters and parameters adjusted for maximum sensitivity. However, indel calling with the same data using the open source variant callers, GATK and SAMtools showed that false negatives could be minimised with the use of appropriate bioinformatics analysis. Furthermore, we identified two variant calling measures, Quality-by-Depth (QD) and VARiation of the Width of gaps and inserts (VARW), which substantially reduced false positive indels, including non-homopolymer associated errors without compromising sensitivity. In our best case scenario that involved the TMAP aligner and SAMtools, we achieved 100% sensitivity, 99.99% specificity and 29% False Discovery Rate (FDR) in indel calling from all 23 samples, which is a good performance for mutation screening using PGM.
conclusionsNew versions of TS, BWA and GATK have shown improvements in indel calling sensitivity and specificity over their older counterpart. However, the variant caller of TS exhibits a lower sensitivity than GATK and SAMtools. Our findings demonstrate that although indel calling from PGM sequences may appear to be noisy at first glance, proper computational indel calling analysis is able to maximize both the sensitivity and specificity at the single base level, paving the way for the usage of this technology for future clinical genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.